Whittington: Sarah Palin Has Offered One Of The Most Sophisticated Analysis Of Obama’s Defense & Foreign Policy Ever Published

Gary P Jackson

One gets the feeling that American national security would be in far better hands if they belonged to the hockey mom from Wasilla than they are now in the hands of the Harvard Law graduate.

~ Mark Whittington

I know lot of people think Sarah Palin would be our “Energy President,” which is almost a given, and/or our “Fiscally Adept President” which again, is kind of given. The thing people forget is Sarah Palin would also be our National Security President.

While everyone, even her harshest critics, will tell you Sarah is the go to person on energy issues, and her record of fiscal responsibility in government is above reproach, many still fail to realize that Sarah Palin has a keen intellectual understanding of foreign policy, and national security.

I blame whoever was in charge of introducing her to the nation on the McCain team. I’ve followed Sarah Palin since her earliest days as Governor, and even I was going what the ….?

With that said, Sarah has a solid understanding of foreign policy, and most certainly understands the urgency of national security. One of the very first speeches Sarah gave, after leaving office, was in Hong Kong, where she spoke extensively about foreign policy and national security. You’ll never hear her speak about energy policy, without tying it to foreign policy and national security. She understands how all of these complex issues intertwine better than most.

Sarah speaks a lot about her son Track, who is in the Army, and has served in Iraq, but there is more to it than that. Sarah was the Commander-In-Chief of the Alaska National Guard, a very active Guard, and one that is permanently deployed.

Her job was not just ceremonial. Sarah Palin was an active C-I-C.

She was also Commander-In-Chief of the Alaska Defense Force, and went to battle with the Obama regime when Obama unilaterally decided to cut off the pensions of the remaining ADF veterans of WW II, who fought the Japanese on Alaskan soil, not long after taking office. 

Sarah took swift and decisive action over Obama’s slap to the face of these American heroes, signing legislation to make sure these brave men still got paid, and worked with the Alaska delegation to Congress to eventually overturn Obama’s slight.

All of this points to a solid, dependable Commander-In-Chief, as does the rest of her record, but the event that has really started gaining steam was her recent speech in Norfolk, Virginia where she absolutely ripped Obama to shreds over his foreign policy and national security stances.

You can read our take here.

In this speech she laid out a bold and aggressive agenda of her own.

Sarah also released a transcript of the highlights of her speech on her Facebook blog. It’s that detailed Facebook entry that has everyone sitting up and taking notice.. It’s a powerful indictment of the Obama regime, but also serves to remind people (and wake some up to the fact) that Sarah Palin has a keen strategic mind, and not just for politics, but for policy.

Sarah is not a boring policy wonk. She is not one of those folks that walk around sounding like an encyclopedia, and thank God for that! Sarah’s skill lies in being able to take all of the pertinent information, lay it out, and see the big picture. She is able to see cause and effect. There are precious few people in our world who are really capable of this.

Anyhow, we’ve known this all along. The big story here is all of the chattering class, the pundits, are starting to realize this as well, and her Facebook blog is receiving rave reviews.

One such pundit is Mark Whittington:

Sarah Palin usually uses her Facebook page to offer brief, pithy comments on issues of the day, or to respond to the latest attacks. But, Palin has now offered one of the most sophisticated analyses of Obama’s defense and foreign policy ever published.

The post, based upon a recent speech in Virginia, covers a variety of points about what passes for Obama’s defense and foreign policy.

On defense spending and the budget deficit, Palin suggests that Obama is practicing fiscal discipline on defense alone, and is being profligate everywhere else: “This administration may be willing to cut defense spending, but it’s increasing it everywhere else. I think we should do it the other way round: cut spending in other departments – apart from defense. We should not be cutting corners on our national security.

Sarah Palin zeroes in on the Navy as especially important to American national security: “Our Navy has global responsibilities. It patrols sea lanes and safeguards the freedoms of our allies – and ourselves. The Navy right now only has 286 ships, and that number may decrease. That will limit our options, extend tours for Navy personnel, lessen our ability to secure our allies and deter our adversaries. The Obama administration seems strangely unconcerned about this prospect.

Palin also attacks the Obama administration for its somewhat weaselly language concerning the War On Terror, refusing to use the term “Islamic” to describe terrorists. She strikes at the proposal to close Guantanamo, imposing an end date on the Afghan Campaign, and the plan to try terrorists like Khalid Sheik Mohammed in civilian courts.

But, the most damning part of Sarah Palin’s polemic against Obama defense and foreign policy is the President’s tendency to coddle enemies and spurn allies, which she quotes a Czech official as being “enemy centric.

On coddling enemies, “Meanwhile, the Obama Administration reaches out to some of the world’s worst regimes. They shake hands with dictators like Hugo Chavez, send letters to the Iranian mullahs and envoys to North Korea, ease sanctions on Cuba and talk about doing the same with Burma. That’s when they’re not on one of their worldwide apology tour.

And, on the Obama tendency to slam allies: “They escalated a minor zoning issue in Jerusalem into a major dispute with our most important ally in the Middle East, Israel. They treated the Israeli Prime Minister shabbily in Washington. When a Turkish sponsored flotilla threatened to violate a legal Israeli blockade of Hamas-run Gaza, the Obama Administration was silent. When Israeli commandos were assaulted as they sought to prevent unmonitored cargoes from being delivered to Hamas terrorists, the Obama Administration sent signals it might allow a UN investigation into the matter – an investigation that would be sure to condemn our ally Israel and bemoan the plight of Hamas. Loyal NATO allies in central Europe were undermined by the cancellation of a missile defense program with virtually no warning.

Why is President Obama making these mistakes? Sarah Palin has an explanation:

When asked whether he believed in American exceptionalism, President Obama answered, ‘I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.’ Amazing. Amazing.”

I think this statement speaks volumes about his world view. He sees nothing unique in the American experience? Really? Our founding, and our founding mothers and fathers? Really? And our history over the past two and half centuries?

This has caused President Obama to be reluctant to embrace America’s role as the dominant super power in the world, to perhaps even think that America as a great power is something pernicious.

One thing that Palin’s analysis of Obama defense and foreign policy should lay to rest forever is the notion of Sarah Palin as brainless bimbo, the caricature first performed by Saturday Night Live’s Tina Fey and used by political comedians like John Stewart and Bill Maher. The analysis shows a depth of understanding of the problems with the Obama administration’s foreign and defense policies that far exceed most people’s understanding.

And, yet, it is Obama who is considered the smart one. One gets the feeling that American national security would be in far better hands if they belonged to the hockey mom from Wasilla than they are now in the hands of the Harvard Law graduate.

We most certainly agree. It’s interesting to note that the other so-called leaders, in the GOP 2012 presidential derby, are all quite conspicuous by their absence on these issues. No one is holding Obama’s feet to the fire but Sarah Palin.

In case you missed her speech:

Obviously Sarah has her own style of delivery, and her own vocabulary, but when I see her give speeches like this …. I am reminded of another great leader: Ronald Reagan.

Like Reagan, Sarah is able to see the big picture, see threats to Liberty and Freedom, take these complex issues and then distill them all down to a simple, but effective and coherent vision of a workable plan.

America needs leadership. Solid, dependable, intelligent leadership. For this, we must look to the North Star. It will be the daughter of our 49th state, the moose hunter, hockey mom, and former Governor of the last frontier, who will lead this nation back to it greatness. It will be Sarah Palin who will make sure that America is always that shining city on a hill


Filed under In The News, Politics

10 responses to “Whittington: Sarah Palin Has Offered One Of The Most Sophisticated Analysis Of Obama’s Defense & Foreign Policy Ever Published

  1. Pingback: Whittington: Sarah Palin Has Offered One Of The Most Sophisticated … | The Daily Conservative

  2. Bloodhound

    Sarah has been and always will be much more qualified to be our President than the current A$$wipe who sits in the Oval Office! Obama wants nothing more than to destroy America and is doing his best to do just that! Obama is not qualified to even clean the toilets at the White House, much less Lead! Lord, Obama Leading is Truly a Joke! The Most Worthless Excuse of a Leader that has ever Existed! Rid America of this Kenyan Ba$tard ManChild and lets get a Decent, Patriotic, American Born person in the Oval Office!

  3. SparkyVA

    She needs a voice coach, some of her high notes are a little abrasive and hard to listen to. She has a great deep voice, just needs to smooth out her presentation. Better to do that then the cosmetic surgery Hillary had before her run for the White House. Most women in broadcast have had voice training to improve their lower voice and make it more understandable to middle age and older folks who have lost some hearing at the upper frequencies.
    Please take this criticism carefully, I want her to win very badly. She has the brains and the backbone to be a great president.

    • Gary P

      Being a Texan it’s always a little funny to listen to folks with accents. As we all know, Texans have no accent, everyone else does!!

      Like everything about a person, the way they talk is who they are. I know where you are coming from, BTW, but I’ll take that Alaska accent over the Northeast Yankee accent. I mean did you ever hear JFK speak?? The man called Cuba “Cuber” !

      I think she will be one of the real greats once in office. One strong woman.

      • Bloodhound

        I am an ex-Pat from Oklahoma, Gary, any your right, Okies and Texans don’t have an accent, only the others! 🙂

        When I was in the military, I had a friend from Boston. Everytime he opened his mouth, it sounded like he was smarting off! He could be praying and it would sound like he was giving God a hard time! Just those darn Yankee accents that can be irritating sometimes! I can imagine what our accents do to them!

      • Gary P

        I know. Good people, but they sure talk funny!

        It’s all good though.

    • Jeanie

      I totally agree — she is going to be one of the great Presidents we’ve ever had!

  4. Johnny56

    I agree with you. I love Palin and She
    has guts. Speaks wise words.
    Has the right (correct) view of things.
    But has to be coached and diciplined
    concerning her oratory skills.
    Reagon was a natural at this, being
    an actor/radio/TV star.
    This was the reason Tina Fae was able
    to make her look stupid.
    You just can’t give the communist sharks in the media any free chum in the water.

  5. Sneaky Pete

    Sarah Palin’s address had many excellent points. We all know that they are right on. However, I’m of the opinion the last few minutes of the address were the most critical.

    It is time that Americans realize that we are in serious trouble. It is time we stand up and be counted. There are numerous candidates out there running for various offices that want to stand up for the principles this country was founded on: God, Freedom,The Constitution a Democratic Republic, and yeah maybe a little Apple Pie.

    Some of these candidates are new some have been in office for some time. We must weed out those who are selling us down the drain and vote them out in November. Then again in 2012. No longer can we sit around and say it doesn’t matter if we vote or not. It does matter. If we don’t change the course this country is on NOW it may be too late down the road.

  6. KBB

    I love Sarah Palin, and think she will be an awesome President. She is the real deal. During speeches to thousands of people, she could benefit from a better sound man. If the sound level of her microphone were raised, she could speak without having to yell. Yelling into a microphone makes ANYONE look bad. I hope her team realizes this and makes a correction.

    Palin in 2012!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s