Rush Limbaugh: Obama and the EPA are a Clear and Present Danger, Terrorists

By Gary P Jackson

You may have seen the video of EPA official Alfredo “Al” Armendariz telling his people that the EPA’s policy was to “crucify” those who they disagreed with, much like the Roman warriors did in ancient times.

This has caused a huge stink, as you can imagine. Of course, before enough folks could see it [and get enough support to crucify the EPA] You Tube pulled the video.

Here Rush Limbaugh says what we already know, that Obama and the EPA are terrorists. They use their heavy handed tactics to terrorize anyone who doesn’t hold the same ideology as they do. The EPA, an agency that seemingly operates outside the law, has the ability to destroy entire industries, with their rules. Unelected bureaucrats control the agency, not our elected officials.

Anyone who has been paying attention understands that the EPA [and Obama] are a clear and present danger to us all.

Audio courtesy


Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “Rush Limbaugh: Obama and the EPA are a Clear and Present Danger, Terrorists

  1. Andrew Han

    You listen to Rush Limbaugh?

    Let us watch him defend Reagan:

    I don’t agree with everything he does, but at least Obama is a Harvard Graduate, and is intelligent enough to formulate logical rebuttals on the fly.

    • Gary P Jackson

      I don’t listen much to Limbaugh, as I am usually too busy. But sad little attempt is just pathetic.

      BTW, how do we KNOW Obama is smart? He sure hasn’t shown it.

      Remember, this moron thinks there are 57 states. That doctors cut off feet to make money. That “Europe” is a country. That Austrians speak “Austrian”. That kids with asthma need “Breathalyzers” He repeatedly called Navy Corpsmen “Corpsemen” and thinks Hawaii [where he grew up] is part of ASIA.

      We’ve not see a single transcript of his from college. Not a single one. He has made ALL of his records off limits. We do know his schooling was paid for by a radical Muslim, Khalidi. WE also know that as “editor” of the “Harvard Law Review” he never penned a single article, or wrote a single opinion.

      Obama is not that smart. All one has to do is listen to him try to speak. Even WITH his telepromter he sounds like an illiterate fool.

      I can forgive stupid, but I can’t forgive the fact that Obama is a dangerous Marxist hellbent on destroying America. He is Cloward-Piven on steroids. The worst president in American history, and that includes on James Earl Carter!

      Grow up.

      • Andrew Han

        Call me shallow, but Obama certainly speaks and writes more intelligently than, for example, Sarah Palin. In his interview with O’Reilly, he is actually able to form substantive and logical rebuttals to accusations on the fly. Compare this to Palin, who responded to Katie Couric’s questioning on her position of the bailout so pathetically, the SNL skit used THE EXACT SAME WORDS for the fake-Palin! Obama’s “57 states!” mistakes are obvious bloopers; Sarah Palin not only makes such mistakes, such as supporting our “North Korean allies”, but makes far more grandoise errors as well. She makes stupid speeches and sides with stupid issues. In comparison, Obama occasionally flunks in 5 second soundbites.

        Disagree with him all you want; I’m certainly not his biggest fan, but there are two things that are difficult to dispute with Obama: that he is well intentioned, and that he is damn smart. Similarly, these two things can be applied to Karl Marx as well.

        And don’t pretend that graduating from Harvard university is unimpressive. Sarah Palin’s education credentials: transferring across four unremarkable colleges before graduating with a mediocre degree. Obama is fairly intellectual; Sarah Palin’s favorite pastime is hunting moose.

        Same thing with Clinton: look up “Clinton kicks the crap out of fox news part 2”. Disagree with him, you may; deny his intelligence, you cannot. I at least grudgingly admit that Bill O’Reilly is a decently intelligent man, when it comes to anything except for religion.

        On a slightly OT note, have you ever wondered why tea-baggers, along with Glenn Beck, admire Thomas Paine so damn much? I’ve seen images of Beck and his right wing tea-bagger fans dressing up as the radical, left wing, atheistic revolutionary who argued for an early form of social wellfare and attacked all organized religion as being institutions created to enslave mankind. Back ON topic, at least Obama does not think that the Founding Fathers “worked tirelessly to end slavery.” At least he does not think that JQA was a founding father; at least he does not think that the Earth is 6000 years old.


        Calling Obama the “worst” president in history is among the most ridiculous claims I’ve heard all week. Worse than Buchanon? Worse than Pierce? Worse than Hoover? Worse than Andrew Johnson? Worse than Harding? Worse than Nixon? Worse than Bush? Until Obama fails to prevent a civil war (Buchanon), illegally wiretaps his opponents (Nixcum) or is proven to be a racist scumbag (Johnson), there are plenty of presidents; all of whom are conservative, mind you, whose incompetence certainly outshines any that Barrack or even Carter may possess in your eyes.

      • Gary P Jackson

        Again, your stupidity, along with bullshit talking points, that were obviously written down for you, are amazing. How are you able to dress yourself in the mornings? Feed yourself?

        Yes, Barack Obama is the worst president in History. He makes Jimmy Carter look good, something NO ONE thought was possible.

        Obama is a failure at every level, and as corrupt as they come. He should spend the rest of his life in prison for what he has done. The billions of tax payer dollars that have been funneled to his supporters is criminal, and he must be made to pay.

        As for him ever having a cogent thought? Since when. The man had to take a teleprompter with him to speak to grade schoolers! The man sounds like a blithering idiot every time he opens his mouth. About the only time he sounds halfway “together” is when he’s spouting talking points from Lenin, Marx, and Alinsky. Other than communist babble, he’s got NOTHING.

        He was supposedly the editor of the Harvard Law Review, and yet, he never published a single word. He didn’t write his first book, “Dreams From My Father” was written by murdering terrorist William Ayers. Even Google knows that:

        His second book was written by a group including Jon Favreau. Obama never penned a word of either.

        In fact, the REASON Ayers wrote “Dreams” is because the publisher was breathing down Obama’s neck for the book, and Obama wasn’t able to write a single word. Complete writer’s block.

        On the OTHER HAND, Sarah Palin has written numerous Op-Eds for the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, USA Today, and the New York Times.

        She’s authored TWO number one best selling books, was Executive Producer of her own hit travel adventure series, and has been known to change NATIONAL POLICY with a single post on Facebook.

        She’s an acknowledged expert on energy issues as well as fiscal ones. She correctly predicted the current financial situation two years ago. In fact, when she first went off on Obama and the Fed over quantitative easing, on of the Wall Street Journal’s resident idiot liberals proclaimed her wrong. The WSJ editorial board sided with HER, and of course, everything she predicted has come to pass.

        Hell, she correctly predicted Obama’s failure FOUR years ago. EVERYTHING she predicted in her acceptance speech at the Republican Convention about Obama has come to pass. EVERYTHING.

        Obama has never had a job in his life. He was a communist agitator “community organizer” a no show Senator and the worst president in history. Possibly the worst leader in the history of the entire world. Unless you want to buy into the idea that Obama’s goal, as president, was to destroy the country, he’s been an absolute failure at every level.

        On the other hand, Sarah Palin has a lifelong history of not only working hard, but having great successes.

        She’s run successful businesses, still does. She was a success as a city council member, and had such a successful run as Mayor, that a decade later, current the Mayor and council members STILL credit her for all of the successes. Her record as a Governor is unmatched by any other.

        Massive reforms, incredible budget cuts, while actually increasing spending on important things like education. She was the highest rated elected official in the country, with a sustained approval rating in the 90s. She left office with the state in better shape than she found it.

        Obama will never be able to say that. In fact, America may never fully recover from this loser’s 4 years in office.

        Now take your raggedy ass talking points on down the road. I’ve indulged you long enough.

  2. Andrew Han

    Wow, you certainly are a hospitable host. “Our only rule is be respectful” is a one way road, is it not?

    You still have not explained how Obama’s “failures” stack up against Pierce, Buchanon, A. Johnson or Nixon. Your criticisms of Obama may actually possess legitimacy, but you mask them all under ridiculous smokescreens, with the typical buzzwords of “communist” and “marxist”. Perhaps you could cut down on the ridiculous hyperbole, and simply acknowledge that Obama is merely [in your opinion] an incompetent president, not a “terrorist”. Calling the Commander in Chief a terrorist is a very serious charge, did you know? Do you even understand what the word “terrorist” means, or does it mean “everybody I don’t agree with”?

    There are a handful of terrible and inept presidents throughout our history that safely shield Obama and Carter from contention, neither of which terrorized political enemies or screwed up Reconstruction. You lack perspective; I’m sure that you will decry the next liberal president to come around as being “evil” and a “marxist”, and, of course, “the worst president EVAR!”

    Understand these simple facts:

    1. Stop using reductio ad absurdums. Obama is not a communist. A communist is one who supports complete government ownership of all industry and property, and equal distribution of wealth. Supporting government regulation of industry does not equate to supporting government ownership of everything. Do you understand what leap in logic means?

    2. Stop filling your rebuttals with completely irrelevant facts that have nothing to do with the argument proposed. Having a high approval rating has jack and squat to do with intelligence. Writing a book is not a task that requires a terribly high intelligence threshold.

    3. A claim =/= proof. You claim that Obama has screwed up the national economy; the recession happened under George Dubya Bush’s watch, who turned the nation’s largest surplus in history to its largest deficit in history. You claim that he supports Marxist ideals, you haven’t named a single one that he supports. Which one will it be? Nationalizing all industry? Elimination of family structure? Abolishment of private ownership of property? I don’t see Obama doing any of these.

    The part about Palin being an “acknowledged expert” on energy was especially hilarious. I predicted that the Iraqi war would make the world opinion of the United States drop; and it did! Harvard, where is my political sciences doctorate? Even if Palin was correct, there was a 33.33% chance that she would guess correctly anyhow: either the economy would improve, it would recede, or it would stagnate.

    But the economy has improved. Unemployment has dropped; the recession that Bush started is over.

    • Gary P Jackson

      Read our comment policy. You should be thankful you haven’t been booted for violating it.

      Yes, Obama is a COMMUNIST. Raised from BIRTH a communist.

      His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham was a communist. His sperm donor “father” Barack Sr was a communist. That’s how the two hooked up. It was quite trendy for little white communist girls to hook up with black “revolutionary” types in the 1960s.

      Stanley Ann’s father Stanley Dunham was a communist and even worked with the Soviets against America. Why do you think the Dunhams left Kansas to go to the Seattle area? Remember, this is a city that has a statue of Lenin. The Northwest was a hotbed of communist activity. In fact, the Dunhams attended the notorious “Little Red Church.”

      All of this information is out there. It’s well documented.

      After Obama’s mother abandoned little Barry, after hooking up with Lolo Soretoro in Indonesia, his white grandfather, Stanley Dunham decided Barry [as he was called back then] needed a black man as a mentor. So who did he choose? None other than anti-America radical, communist, and pornographer Frank Marshall Davis, from Chicago. Davis was out in Hawaii basically hiding in plain sight. He was a known child molester, and a disciple of Saul Alinsky. Davis had been kicked out of the NAACP for pushing his communist propaganda. Sadly, that once great organization succumbed to communism, and like most democrats, believes Marxism is cool.

      This is all FACT, just because you can’t accept it doesn’t make it any less true.

      As for Sarah Palin, YES, she is a widely acknowledged expert on energy issues. Before the Obama smear machine took hold, she was the go-to gal for questions on energy, and regularly appeared on all of the channels and wrote OP-Eds for all the big papers. She still writes a significant number of articles for the Wall Street Journal as well as USA Today.

      You seem to forget that before becoming governor, Palin was the Chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. One of the most powerful jobs in Alaska and a job that required extensive knowledge.

      As Governor she was also chosen to be the Chairman of the nation’s Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, a compact of all of the energy producing states. She was also chosen by the other governors [both Republican and democrat] to be the National Governors Association’s Natural Resources Committee Chairman.

      So all of her peers consider her an expert as well.

      It’s truly pathetic to see someone who can spend so much time spouting other people’s talking points, without having a mind of their own. Or the ability to learn.

      As Ronald Reagan would say: “It’s not that our liberal friends are ignorant, it’s just they know so much that isn’t so.”

  3. Andrew Han

    Guilt by association here? Since when does Obama having communist relatives make he himself a communist? (mind you, Frank Davis was an outspoken advocate of racial equality).

    And what is “communist” to you, anyhow? Communism in its purist form looks great on paper, but has failed miserably every time one tries to actually implement it. However, none of Obama’s policies are purely Marxist. If you think that some of them are bad for our country, more evidence is needed than “because it’s communism, and communism = bad!”. J. E. Hoover spied on Dr. King and fabricated stories on him because he suspected that the civil rights leader was a communist. The “communist” buzzword is repeatedly used to oppose leaders when one lacks an actual, reasoned, argument.

    Take health care, for example. The United States spends 23% more GDP per capita than Canada to cover around 80% of its citizens, whereas Canada’s care covers everyone. I lived in Canada for five years, and I can assure you that I needed to draw no lotteries for health care, to cover that ridiculous myth.

    Owning a car is a privileged, not a right. Ergo, the auto industry is privatized. Yet health care should be a right, because it is entirely necessary for survival. Especially for poor peoples’ children.

    I must remind you that the Child Labor Act was a regulation policy. Should we scrap this simply because it is a socialistic policy?

    Pure socialism doesn’t work; pure laizze faire doesn’t work either. And deregulation of business is a horrible, horrible idea. Not only does it hurt the economy, but it removes various necessary safeguards to protect the public good, such as the Pure Food and Drug act, a “socialistic” policy that certainly increased the standard of food and drug products in the States.


    Sarah Palin:

    PLEASE, defend her here. And do not make a red herring/ad hominem by questioning Katie Couric’s motivations here; focus on Palin’s own, self made response. Tell me that she is an intelligent woman.

    Plessy vs Flerguson, Dred Scott vs Sanford, Koremastu vs US. See? It isn’t a hard question!

    • Gary P Jackson

      As I have noted before, you are a tedious and terribly boring poster. You have nothing to offer.

      We all know that Hoover spied on Dr King. So did LBJ and Bobby Kennedy. Democrats are evil, racists. That’s well established.

      Communist isn’t just a buzzword. It wasn’t that long ago that a list was published noting all of the communists serving in Congress. The Socialist Party USA published it’s list of democrats who were members. Most were also members of the Communist Party USA. Congressman Allen West made a big stink a month or so back, but we published the list over a year ago.

      As for Obama, hell yes that clown is a Communist. He was a member of the New Party, a Chicago Communist group. Remember where this nimrod started his political career. Obama launched his political career in the living room of a murdering domestic terrorist, and devout communist, Bill Ayers.

      Hell, don’t believe me, far better researchers than myself have put it all together.

      David Horowitz, a former 60s radical who was raised as a communist, has all of the straight dope on these rotten sons-a-bitches.

      Horowitz’s Discover the Networks has Obama’s life, his involvement in communism, radicalism, and the murderous Bill Ayers and his cop killer wife Bernardine Dohrn.

      BTW, here is Larry Grathwohl, who infiltrated Ayers Weather Underground. He talks about these communist loons and what they had planned if they had succeeded.

      Obama and Ayers are best buddies. Their Chicago homes are less than a half mile from each other. Not only did Obama launch his career in these terrorist’s home, the Ayers-Dohrn family used to babysit the Obama kids!

      THIS is the evil Obama runs with.

      In 1969 Weather Underground founders Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn (who were to become Pres. Obama’s personal friends and associates for many years) put Charles Manson on the cover of their occasional newspaper, “Fire”. At what was billed as a “War Council” in Flint Michigan that same year, Ayers and his comrades took to greeting each other with “the fork” – three fingers pointed upwards, in honor of Manson. (Google Dohrn’s Flint conference quote on Manson – and Sharon Tate, who was 8 1/2 months pregnant at the time.) In 1972 Ayers dedicated the WU’s manifesto, “Prairie Fire”, to his cultural and political heroes — a list which included Sen. Robert Kennedy’s assassin, Sirhan Sirhan.

      Throughout their career as terrorist bombers, Ayers and Dohrn were constantly trying to break the Left free of its “bourgeois” commitment to any standard of justice or decency. By adopting Charles Manson as their own, by praising Manson as a hero of the counterculture, they hoped to smash the Left’s “bourgeois” ties to civilization and thus spark similar acts of horrific “revolutionary” violence against innocent people.

      Over 400 people attended that Flint conference. Can’t help but wonder what positions they have now, unknown to anyone but each other…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s