By Gary P Jackson
I didn’t even know this was a thing until I saw a tweet by TheRealFeminist
In an article entitled Photoshopping a Fetus Onto Your Pregnant Stomach Isn’t Just Tacky, It’s Bad for Women, Allison Benedikt bemoans the relatively new practice of women photoshopping their baby’s sonogram onto their bare stomach. This seams like a sweat idea to me, but Benedikt spends four paragraphs berating women who do this, and even includes a photo of a pregnant woman with the dire warning: “Think before you photoshop” Oh my, how evil this photoshopping must be!
You can read the whole thing, but I’ll cut to the chase. The radical left is scared to death that America is changing. Human beings have come to realize that an unborn child is one of us. A human being. They have feelings. They are not a blob of tissue, as the murderous liberals would have you believe.
By putting an image of their baby, to go along with their pregnant belly, women are telling the world they have a CHILD, not a useless blob. This is very, very bad for the culture of death liberals have created. And the author of this piece is freaking out.
It is, of course, dubious to even call this thing on the Internet a trend. But it got us thinking about how the more we treat fetuses like people—including them in our family photo shoots, tagging them on our Facebook walls, giving them their own Twitter accounts—the harder it will be to deny that they are people when the next, say, personhood amendment comes up, with legislators and activists arguing that “the unborn child” inside a pregnant woman’s womb should have the same rights as the living among us.
Of course everyone has the right to celebrate their impending kid however they see fit—we would not have gone the sonogram photoshop route, but perhaps that’s because the 3-D smush face ultrasound printouts we walked out of our OB’s office with always could have been titled, “Ben Franklin on a Very Bad Day.” Still, casually and publicly assigning human attributes to not-yet-human embryos—including an avocado-sized embryo in the family portrait—does not seem like the best way to argue against measures that seek to treat that avocado like a member of our collective American family. Our advice: If you’re not, for instance, OK with the movement to dole out harsher punishments to a woman caught smoking pot if that woman is pregnant, then please don’t go superimposing a blunt onto your sonogram to then Photoshop onto your stomach. That’s just tacky.
Notice how the author puts quotation marks around “unborn child” as if to say it’s not really a child, it’s just an avocado seed!
She is also extremely angered that people think of an embryo as a human, and scared to death we might want to make sure a baby has rights the rest of us have.
What kind of twisted mind thinks this way? More to the point, what sort of sick mind then puts these thoughts on the internet for all to see?
These are the same sort of moonbats who think animals and trees should have the same rights as humans. Think I’m making this up? Meet Cass Sunstein, Obama’s Senate Confirmed™ regulatory Czar.
Liberals are sick, depraved creatures. Nothing is more sacred to them than the ability to slaughter innocent children. Yet, you can always bet when it comes time to administer the death penalty to a cop killer, or other deserving criminal, these are the same people who’ll stand in the rain, holding a candle-light vigil, and proclaiming how wrong capital punishment is.
By reminding everyone that an unborn child is still a child, it makes it harder for the liberal death cult to continue. Makes it harder to get government to give them your tax dollars too!
All I can say is women, be proud of your children. If you want to photoshop your their sonogram on your belly, go for it! Fetuses are people too!