Interesting: Washington Post Pulls Ammo Stockpiling Story Politico and Others Used to Smear Sarah Palin UPDATED: WaPo’s Editor Responds

UPDATED: The Washington Post’s Executive Editor Martin Baron responds.

As I wrote originally, there might be a reasonable explanation why an article appearing in the Washington Post and linked to and hyped by Politico had suddenly disappeared a couple of days after being used to smear Governor Palin, and being shown to be fictitious.

I was pleased to get a quick and reasonable response from the Post’s editor:

Dear Mr. Jackson:

I apologize for the time it has taken to get back to you. First, we had to determine the nature and origin of the story you referred to and what had become of it. Our staff has now conducted that research and filled me in.

The story you searched was written not by the Washington Post, but rather by the Associated Press. Such AP stories flow onto our website automatically, and then become dead links when under our contract we lose rights after 14 days. In this case, that’s today.

The second URL appears to be a version of the same story supplied by a service called Perfect Market, which also flows automatically onto our site. The same rules for publication on our site apply with regard to that as well.

Here is the wire as it appeared on another site:

As you can see, it is a story written by the Associated Press and picked up by other news sites, typically in an automated fashion.

I note that you’ve addressed this issue on your website. You suggest that (a) this was a story written by the Washington Post and (b) that we removed it under suspicious or nefarious circumstances. Neither is accurate.


Martin Baron
Executive Editor

This seems reasonable. Though one wonders why they’d bother to publish an article that it’s readers can’t come back to in a couple of weeks.

It should be noted that Fox News has the same AP article, dated February 14, 2013 available on it’s site as of now.

I have no real beef with the Post, my beef is with the propaganda sites mentioned in the original articles, and their use of a false report to smear Governor Palin and attempt to discredit he factual statement. As I wrote below, it sure seemed odd the article at the Post disappeared at the exact same moment all of the controversy was brewing. At least we know why.

The original post is below. I would say substitute the AP every time you read Washington Post but they did indeed run this fictitious article, written by someone for the Associated Press claiming these rounds were merely for “target practice” so we can’t let them completely off the hook!

By Gary P Jackson

Here’s an interesting little twist to the saga of Obama’s lapdog media trying to smear Sarah Palin over her stating the fact that the Obama regime is stockpiling over one billion rounds of ammo, mostly man killing hollowpoints.

Yesterday we exposed the lies and slanderous commentary coming from left wing propaganda sites such as Politico, Slate, and The Atlantic, and their attempt to smear Sarah Palin.

In his slanderous article, Politico’s Kevin Cirilli linked to another Obama water carrier over at the Washington Post who published an article entitled Not so sinister: Homeland Security is stockpiling ammo for target practice.

While government agencies are, in fact, purchasing large amounts of ammunition, they are doing so for training exercises and shooting ranges, according to federal officials. The Washington Post last month summed up the Department of Homeland Security’s buying of more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition for training with an article headlined, “Not so sinister: Homeland Security is stockpiling ammo for target practice.”

Funny thing. This morning, while doing some follow-up, I noticed the Post has pulled the story claiming the regime was merely stockpiling bullets “for target practice.” Wonder why that is?

A quick Google search of the article’s title led me back to another dead URL. A subsequent Bing search netted a different URL, but pushing the magic “enter” button on my keyboard nets nothing more than another dead page:

Obviously, blogging being what it is, other websites have excerpted from the Post’s untruthful piece, but the original no longer exists.

I find this very interesting. There may be a logical, legitimate explanation for the article disappearing. And I’d love to hear it, if there is.

I’ve reached out to the editors at the Post but have yet to get any reply. If they can explain why a controversial article, used to smear someone who made a factual statement, just disappeared, I’ll be happy to give them their say.

Meanwhile, one has to sit and wonder why the Post article telling it’s readers not to worry, the Obama regime is stockpiling over a billion rounds of ammo, mainly consisting of man killing hollowpoints, but it’s OK, it’s just for “target practice” …. has up and disappeared from their website.

Such is how the corrupt media works. Write a fictitious story, covering up the real intentions of the regime, and when the heat comes, instead of owning it, just send it down the memory hole.

Maybe this is why a new Rasmussen poll finds that only 6% of Americans find the media “very trustworthy” and 42% find it “not very trustworthy” or “not at all trustworthy.


Filed under In The News, Politics, sarah palin

6 responses to “Interesting: Washington Post Pulls Ammo Stockpiling Story Politico and Others Used to Smear Sarah Palin UPDATED: WaPo’s Editor Responds

  1. halberst2013

    Dude! You’re funny! That was a wire story from the AP: is the cached page you are referring to on the WP. The story you claim has been removed for some sort of conspiratorial reason is all over the place including from the original wire source here:

    Don’t worry, I’m sure you’ll find some other easy to disprove conspiracy.

    P.s. watch out for the United Nations black helicopters over your house! 😉

    • Gary P Jackson

      It may be cashed in Google, but it is no longer on the Washington Post website, which Politico linked to. There’s a definite reason for that. Still waiting for the editors at WaPo to explain why they no longer want their readers to see this fictitious article.

      We noted OTHER sites had the article. I know comprehension is hard for democrats, but ….

      Oh, and we don’t do black helicopters here. We save that for democrats and Alex Jones/Ron Paul cultists.

  2. halberst2013

    So there’s a missing link to a wire story on a newspaper site to a story that’s available all over the internet and that’s a conspiracy? The story you say WaPo pulled wasn’t theirs. It was an AP wire story still on the AP site and as you mention all over the internet. You’ve never seen a broken link before? If you need to see it again, it’s on FOX “News” too: is it more credible there?

    • Gary P Jackson

      My point is Politico used the Post as it’s source for a fictitious story. The story is fact free. Fox, like the Post uses the AP as a news service, meaning it automatically is put on their site. Doesn’t make it any more factual. The AP is notorious for it’s inaccurate, biased reporting.

      For some reason you are looking for something that isn’t. We don’t engage in black helicopters or conspiracy theories of any sort. In fact, we go out of our way to denounce the Ron Paul/Alex Jones types. They harm our efforts to talk about the real dangers the Obama regime poses to mankind.

      We asked for, and received a reasonable explanation from the editors at the Post, which I published for all to see. It’s impossible to be any fairer than that.

      Our main concern here, is the left wing media is lying to the American people, and a group of far left websites are using it to smear Governor Palin. That should concern ever red blooded American. We can’t allow these propagandists to succeed.

      • halberst2013

        Nice update: maybe now at least you would boost Rasmussen’s press trustworthy ratings.

      • Gary P Jackson

        Rasmussen is a polling agency, not the “press”. There record of accuracy is better than most. Though no opinion poll is a 100% accurate picture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s