There’s blood in the streets, it’s up to my ankles
(She came)
There’s blood on the streets, it’s up to my knee
(She came)
Blood on the streets, in the town of Chicago
(She came)
Blood on the rise, it’s following me
Think about the break of day
She came and then she drove away
Sunlight in her hair
(She came)
Blood in the streets runs a river of sadness
(She came)
Blood in the streets it’s up to my thigh
(She came)
Yeah, the river runs red down the legs of the city
(She came)
The women are crying rivers of weepin’
She came into town and then she drove away
Sunlight in her hair
Indians scattered on dawn’s highway bleeding
Ghosts crowd the young child’s fragile eggshell mind
Blood in the streets in the town of New Haven
Blood stains the roofs and the palm trees of Venice
Blood in my love in the terrible summer
Bloody red sun of Phantastic L.A.
Blood screams the pain as they chop off her fingers
Blood will be born in the birth of a nation
Blood is the rose of mysterious union
There’s blood in the streets, it’s up to my ankles
Blood in the streets, it’s up to my knee
Blood in the streets in the town of Chicago
Blood on the rise, it’s following me
Peace Frog [Abortion Stories] was written by Jim Morrison, Robbie Krieger,John Densmore, and Ray Manzarek.
By Gary P Jackson
Peace Frog was written in the studio, after Robbie Krieger came up with what would be the opening guitar riffs. The lyrics are based on two of Jim Morrison’s poems, one titled Abortions Stories which is where the bloody images in the song come from.
Lately I find myself more on Twitter [my favorite instant-access social media] than writing here on our blog. I enjoy the intimidate interaction and exchange of information. Last week though, was quite disturbing. With all of the information coming out about the evils Planned Parenthood is involved in, my timeline has been filled with things no human being should ever have to see. Images of dead babies, victims of the sub-human animals that perform abortions. Babies that are full size, dead, covered in blood. Babies so small you can hold them in the palm of your hand, dismembered … in a dozen pieces. These are things I can’t get out of my head. Probably never will
It makes you wonder how the savages that perform abortions, and all of their fans in the democrat party, can sleep at night. If they were human, the very thought of this slaughter, on an industrial scale, would haunt them in their dreams. But alas, there is no humanity in a democrat. No humanity in a liberal. Most certainly no humanity in the Dr Mengeles who perform these barbaric acts of slaughter. Never in the history of mankind has such evil existed, and never in human history has such evil been so tolerated.
Peace Frog, as the song is titled, is likely the only mainstream anti-abortion song ever published and recorded. The Doors were a favorite group of mine growing up, and this a favorite song. It was as I grew older, I learned the story behind the song, and the lyrics took on a whole new meaning.
As I needed a way to deal with the evils I’ve seen, the images of blood, and death, I knew this song, with it’s powerful lyrics and symbolism [Yeah, the river runs red down the legs of the city, the women are crying rivers of weepin’] would help me deal. If music is food for the soul, I hoped to find nourishment and comfort in this song. Morrison’s incredible voice screaming the screams I need to scream. The pain of these innocent children as they are dismembered, alive and without painkillers. You see, painkillers would damage the viability of the body parts that Planned Parenthood is selling to the highest bidder.
For those still with me, there are other images in this song that come from other life experiences of Jim and the band.
The Indians are a recurring theme for Morrison. When he was a small child, his parents and he, were traveling and came upon a horrific automobile accident, the occupants were Indians. Morrison felt the ghosts of those Indians took up residence in his soul.
The references to Chicago [Blood on the streets, in the town of Chicago] come from the 1968 democrat party convention/Klan rally, held in Chicago, where massive riots broke out. Violence is always the answer, for democrats, it seems.
Blood in the streets in the town of New Haven refers to a 1967 incident in New Haven, Ct where The Doors were playing a concert. Before the show, Morrison was backstage on a bench, with a groupie, making out, when a cop come busting through the door wanting to know what they were doing. “Nothing” was Morrison’s reply, to which the cop answered by pulling out a can of mace and spraying it in Jim’s eyes, blinding him for about 30 minutes. After recovering, the show started, and as one can imagine, Morrison was rather agitated, and eventually stopped singing and started going after the cops, telling fans what had happened. He threw in a few frills and dressing, to go along with it. The cops then rushed the stage and arrested Morrison, right in the middle of the show. A first in Rock and Roll history. As you can imagine, some Doors fans were less than pleased and started attacking the cops.
Adam Sandler used Robbie Krieger’s opening licks in his 1998 movie The Waterboy.
Jim Morrison was one of our generation’s great singer-songwriter-poets. When this song was published [1970] our nation was in the middle of the sexual revolution and the abortion debate was quite heated. It was those who understood basic decency and humanity vs those who didn’t care, and just wanted to “do their own thing” and to hell with the consequences to themselves, or others. Sadly, evil won out over good, but there were voices that stood for humanity and called out evil. Jim Morrison’s voice was one of those. He was rebellious and anti-establishment, but he shared the common decency all humans share and liberalism forcefully rejects.
God bless all those who stand against evil.
On average, Planned Parenthood slaughters 1000 innocent babies every single working day. In total, Big Abortion slaughters 3000 innocent children every single working day. Thankfully these numbers are down, from years past, but that still means over ONE MILLION innocent children will be murdered, for profit, this year.
Peace Frog can be found on various Best of albums, and of course, the original Morrison Hotel which is excellent through and through.
Jack McMahon, the attorney for convicted murderer Kermit Goznell, calls him a “gentleman” and a “dream client.” McMahon claims things just “went awry“!
Megyn Kelly tears into this idiot when he tried to justify the barbaric murders of children.
After their media partners could no longer suppress the news of the atrocities that occurred in convicted murderer Kermit Gosnell’s slaughterhouse, the abortion cultists from Planned Parenthood and NARAL worked overtime trying to spin Gosnell as a one time deal, when in fact, we are learning that Gosnell is the norm in this evil baby slaughtering business, not the exception.
Last week I wrote about a vile, evil, despicable man named LeRoy Carhart. Carhart is a celebrated late term abortionist. His particular brand of evil, which allows the dead child to stay in the mother’s womb for days, has caused the deaths of numerous women. When describing this practice to an undercover operative, he said it was like “putting meat in a crock pot.” If you followed the Gosnell murder trial, you know Gosnell made comments just as disgusting about the children he murdered.
I’m going to say something I find myself saying more and more these days:
I am simply unable to distinguish between those who support abortion, and the Nazis who ran the death camps. These murdering abortionists do so with glee, and keep trophies like a serial killer would. They have more in common with Nazi butcher Josef Mengele than actual human beings!
It’s impossible for me to convey just how sickened and outraged I am with mere words.
Now we have another case of an abortionist murdering children AFTER they are born. I am sad to say this vile, sub-human bastard is in Houston.
Douglas Karpen has three abortion mills in Texas. Operation Rescue has been working with informants to expose this evil:
Houston, TX – After the conviction of late-term abortionist Kermit Gosnell on murder charges, Operation Rescue has been repeatedly asked if there is any evidence that similar practices exist at abortion clinics elsewhere in the nation. That documentation has now been released.
Operation Rescue arranged to have Life Dynamics, Inc. produce a video interview, released yesterday, with three informants who came to Operation Rescue as the result of our Abortion Whistleblowers Program, which offers a reward of $25,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of abortionists who are breaking the law.
The three informants, Deborah Edge, Gigi Aguliar, and Krystal Rodriguez, have come forward to tell of their horrific experiences working for abortionist Douglas Karpen, at one of three of his Texas abortion clinics, the Aaron Women’s Clinic in Houston. A fourth informant has co-operated with Operation Rescue, filing an affidavit about her experiences, but remains at this time anonymous.
As shocking as their stories are, these women did more than just talk; they brought forward evidence of illegal late-term abortions in the form of photos taken on their cell phones at the Karpen’s clinic on Schumacher Lane in Houston.
The photos were scandalous. They depicted two babies aborted well beyond the legal limit of 24 weeks in Texas. Their necks had been cut.
The photos mentioned are gruesome. Honestly, I threw up looking at the very first one. Man’s inhumanity to man is something one never gets used to. You can follow the link here, if you wish to view the photos, but be forewarned, they will upset you.
More: [emphasis mine]
“The photos show babies that are huge, with gashes in their necks, indicating that these babies were likely born alive, then killed, just as Kermit Gosnell did at his ‘House of Horrors’ clinic in Philadelphia,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue. “In fact, there are numerous similarities between Karpen and the Gosnell case, including the disregarding of complaints by the authorities that allowed both men to continue their illegal operations.”
Signs of life
In both cases, the babies’ skin is pink, noting a lack of masceration, an early form of decomposition that happens in babies that die in the womb. Massive bruising on the extremities of one of the babies indicates the baby’s heart was pulsing with life when the trauma was inflicted likely when grasping instruments latched on to bring the baby down into the birth canal. The eyes of the other child are open in a nightmarish expression of pain, revealing development greater than 26-28 weeks. Both sets of photos were taken sometime in 2011.
The video interview of the three informants verified the worst.
“When he did an abortion, especially an over 20 week abortion, most of the time the fetus would come completely out before he cut the spinal cord or he introduced one of the instruments into the soft spot of the fetus, in order to kill the fetus,” said Deborah Edge, who worked as a surgical assistant for Karpen for about 15 years until leaving in March, 2011.
“I thought, well, it’s an abortion you know, that’s what he does, but I wasn’t aware that it was illegal…Most of the time we would see him where the fetus would come completely out and of course, the fetus would still be alive,” Edge continued.
How often did this happen?
“I think every morning I saw several, on several occasions,” she said. “If we had 20-something patients, of course ten, or twelve, or fifteen patients would be large procedures, and out of those large procedures, I’m pretty sure that I was seeing at least three or four fetuses that were completely delivered in some way or another,” said Edge, acknowledging that these babies would be alive.
She described how some babies would emerge too soon and would be alive, moving, and breathing. She also told of how Karpen would sometimes deliver the babies feet first with the toes wiggling until he stabbed them with a surgical implement. At the moment the toes would suddenly splay out before going limp. Sometimes he would kill the babies by “twisting the head off the neck,” according to Edge.
Women would be given doses of Cytotec, a drug that causes strong and unpredictable uterine contractions, and would deliver while they were waiting in line to see Karpen, some in toilets, one in the hallway.
“He just picked it up with one of those [chux] pads and put it in the trash bag,” said Krystal Rodriguez of the baby born in the hallway.
“As long as the patient had the cash, he was going to do it past 25 weeks,” she said.
But not all the babies came out intact. When there was difficulty, Karpen would dismember them, a process that was, according to the surgical assistant Deborah Edge, a bloody mess.
“Sometimes he couldn’t get the fetus out” she explained. “He would yank pieces – piece by piece – when they were oversize. And I’m talking about the whole floor dirty. I’m talking about me drenched in blood.”
Undercover investigation and a troubled past
It all began in early 2011, when Operation Rescue was conducting an undercover investigation of several Texas abortion clinics when it discovered that Karpen appeared to be violating the Texas informed consent law that required that abortionists give the state-mandated information personally on patient conference calls set up for that purpose. In addition to the improper use of a recording, he was not on the line to answer questions, as the law required. Operation Rescue’s Cheryl Sullenger filed a complaint with the Texas Medical Board concerning this violation.
Sullenger submitted a statement to the TMB noting Karpen’s documented history of problems, including series of botched abortions stretching back to 1988 when 15-year old Denise Montoya hemorrhaged and died after a 26-week abortion done by Karpen.
She told the TMB of a documented incident on February 6, 2005, when a sewer broke at Karpen’s Texas Ambulatory Surgical Center, located at 2421 N. Shepherd in Houston, causing sewage to spill into the parking lot of a neighboring car dealership. Maribeth Smith, an employee of the car dealership said she is convinced she saw human body parts mixed in with the sewage. She took photographs, believing the human tissue came from the clinic.
“Whether it’s legal or not, it’s not right,” Smith said. “This whole area is nothing but raw sewage and bloody pieces. There were little legs coming out from one side.”
A Health Department worker called 911 to report a second spill at the same abortion clinic. When asked who she was with she told the dispatcher, “Health Department…and we handle normal medical waste, but this is beyond us. He says he can see fetuses and fingers and everything.” (Emphasis in transcript.)
Sullenger hoped that the history of documented abuses would help convince the TMB to act swiftly to protect the public.
Whistleblower comes forward
The following month, Deborah Edge contacted Operation Rescue with her first-hand account Karpen’s practices after she had smuggled one of Operation Rescue’s Whistleblower flyers out of his clinic, knowing that she needed to call.
In addition to the accounts of the illegal late-term abortions, other abuses Edge witnessed included:
*Falsification of ultrasounds to produce younger fetal ages of babies over the legal limit or older fetal ages to extract more money out of women.
*Fraudulent billing practices.
*Surgical equipment not properly sterilized.
*Reuse of disposable instruments.
*Unqualified workers drawing and administering drugs.
*Late-term abortions done at 28 weeks and later. (Texas law permits only to 24 weeks.)
*Lack of adequate nursing staff.
*Concealing poorly kept logs from inspectors to prevent deficiency citations.
*Hiring nurses through a temp agency to work only on days when inspections are scheduled.
*Mistreating heavy women and inappropriately touching attractive women while under sedation.
*Sexual harassment.
Edge explained that Karpen was able to evade detection by having his workers hide sanitation logs and other incriminating documentation from inspectors on the occasions they would come by the clinic.
“Karpen might have a little newer equipment and a little cleaner clinic, but his shoddy practices certainly mirror those of convicted murderer Kermit Gosnell. Certainly if anyone deserved Board discipline, it was this guy,” said Sullenger.
There is much, much more to this disturbing report. As we are learning, there is no such thing as a “safe” abortion. Nor, looking at the volume coming through Karpen’s House of Death, is it “rare“.
Here’s an undercover video from the abortion mill. Again, I want to warn readers, this isn’t for the faint of heart.
Liberals have created a culture that tells women they are better off murdering a child, and risking their own death, than being a responsible human being. It’s an evil so great I can’t wrap my mind around it completely. Of all of the horrors man has inflicted on man, this may be the worse.
Roughly 1.2 MILLION babies are slaughtered every single year. This murder on an industrial scale like nothing in history.
Recently it was revealed that one time popular singer Cher, a rabid supporter of abortion, and every other radical leftist cause, was almost aborted herself. Her mother stopped herself at the last moment. There are many stories like this out there. People saved by a last minute dose of humanity.
Though her politics disgust me, I have always been a fan of Cher’s singing. I have to wonder home many Chers have we been denied, simply because their mother killed them?
Most abortions, by a significant amount, are performed on black children. In fact, the only reason abortion was legitimized in the first place was because of racists like Margaret Sanger, a rabid eugenicist in the era of “enlightenment,” who saw abortion as a way to genetically engineer a more perfect human species. Sanger’s stated goal was to wipe out the Negro race.
Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood who is celebrated by democrats to this day as some sort of saint, teamed with the KKK, in order to push this black genocide.[by getting people to accept abortion] Sanger called Negroes “human weeds. She reflected the very essence of the progressive-liberal ideology. Still does.
One wonders how many Martin Luther Kings, Jackie Robinsons, George Washington Carvers, and even Michael Jacksons we have been deprived of, because of the evils created by rabid liberalism.
The ritualistic murder of our innocent children must stop. Abortion isn’t “women’s health or “reproductive health.” You’ll be doing the world a favor if punch everyone in the mouth who utters those words in your presence!
Those who preach rabid liberalism, and abortion, are the most evil society has to offer. Not only do they slaughter millions of innocent children, they put an equal amount of women’s lives in peril. And let’s not forget the chances of developing breast and ovarian cancer increases greatly after an abortion. Many women suffer from depression and even suicidal tendencies. Of course, the murder cult doesn’t share that knowledge willingly with it’s victims.
As human beings, it is our challenge, maybe our greatest challenge, to stop the barbaric practice of abortion forever. We must educate those around us. There are much better, and safer solutions, than murdering innocent children and putting the live of their mothers in peril.
In George Orwell’s Animal Farm, two young pigs–Napoleon and Snowball– take control of the farm when Old Major, a boar, dies. As part of their “revolution”, the pigs create a series of laws for all the animals of the manor. One of these laws is “all animals are equal”. As the pigs gain more and more control and manipulate their fellow animals even further, the series of laws devolve into a single law–all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. In some ways, this seems to be the law written by our governmental leaders today. Looking at the events of the month of April alone, our government seems to have written an overarching law– “all people deserve privacy, but some people deserve privacy more than others”.
Last Friday, President Obama became the first sitting president to speak at a Planned Parenthood event. In his demagogic speech, the President highlighted the Roe v. Wade decision and its affirmation of a woman’s “right to privacy”. Later in his speech, he tried to characterize pro-life legislation as wanting to come between a woman and her doctor. However, when it comes to the privacy of gun owners, the President and some members of the Senate of both parties believe that the government could come between a woman or man and her or his doctor when it comes to asking questions about guns in the home. The gun control legislation that was ultimately defeated earlier this month would have made exceptions to HIPPA laws (laws that were made to protect patients’ privacy) allowing for more mental health information to be entered the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). Why is it OK for a woman’s right to privacy to be respected when it comes to abortion, but not when it comes to the second amendment?
When Boston police and federal officials were searching for Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev earlier this month following the horrific bombing at the Boston marathon, they went house-to-house searching for the suspected bomber, as depicted in this video:
The images of what happened in Boston last Friday should disturb any Constitution-loving American. The very reason the Fourth Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights was to protect Americans from overly broad search and seizures. The Amendment states that authorities must have “probable cause” before searching “persons, houses, papers, and effects.” As in, they or another witness saw the suspect run into a house, or they had good intelligence that suspect was hiding in a specific location. That wasn’t the case and the FBI and police over-stepped their legal boundaries, according to the Fourth Amendment.
She is absolutely right. While, yes, officials were looking for a terror suspect, there were no search warrants issued. There was not “probable cause” that the folks who were led out of their homes at gunpoint were guilty of anything . Meanwhile, as more information has come out about the Tsarnaev brothers, it is unknown whether or not they had taxpayer funded cell phones, These cell phones may have been used to help coordinate and communicate the attack. The reason given? The FCC said that answering such questions would violate privacy laws. Why were the Tsarnaev brothers’ privacy seen as more important than that of other Bostonians? Why was the innocents’ privacy violated while the privacy of the accused was protected?
Additionally, the House passed a cybersecurity bill (CISPA) on April 18th, which would allow the federal government to collect information from corporations without a warrant and essentially nullify whatever privacy policies those companies had in place. Supporters of the bill believe this would help ward off hackers, but its vague language could very easily lead to an abuse of power. The bill is essentially dead in the Senate, but this is not the first time that members of the federal government have tried to usurp the fourth amendment when it comes to the internet, nor will it be the last. Additionally, the bill is rife with potential cronyism. Congress is trying to infringe on constitutional rights to pad their own pocketbooks.
Again, the federal government has a privacy double standard. Earlier this month, with unanimous support from both chambers of Congress and the president, a key portion of the STOCK Act was repealed. This means that legislative and executive staffers do not have to disclose their potential conflicts of interests, such as stock holdings, online. Congress, the President, the Vice president, and candidates would have the option of putting such information online, but it would no longer be mandatory. While Congress is trying to push legislation that could potential make private information available to the government, the government has decreased the amount of information–information that allows constituents to hold their leaders accountable–accessible to the public.
Those who write the laws should not be above the laws, but what should we expect from people who think they are “more equal” than the rest of us?
Today President Barack Obama addressed members of the baby murdering death cult Planned Parenthood. Obama is the first sitting president in history to do so. He called the murder of innocent children “women’s health care” and said “God bless you” to the murderers. Of course, there was no mention of Gosnell at this Klan rally. From his vile speech:
As long as we’ve got to fight to make sure women have access to quality, affordable health care, and as long as we’ve got to fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you’ve also got a president who’s going to be right there with you, fighting every step of the way. Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you.
Disgusting. Am I the only one who has noticed the ONLY choice a democrat wants an American to have is the choice to murder an innocent child. When it comes to actual healthcare, these evil barbarians don’t want you to have any choice whatsoever.
Sarah Palin weighed in on this evil man:
There’s no such thing as a coincidence. Today I’m looking forward to speaking at a pro-life women’s resource center in Nevada. I intend again to remind women that we are strong enough and capable enough to choose life and work together to create a culture that empowers everyone to live to the fullest.
How ironic that on this same day President Obama will be headlining a gala event for the highly controversial and repeatedly discredited organization Planned Parenthood. He’s the first sitting president to speak to them, but then again he’s also the first president who is so radically pro-abortion that as a state senator he refused three times to vote in favor of legislation that would simply provide medical attention to babies born alive from botched abortions.
Considering the role Planned Parenthood has played in looking the other way while the mass murdering abortion doctor Gosnell butchered babies born alive from his horrific infanticide procedures and abused his women patients, it’s perhaps not surprising that this same president sees nothing wrong with allowing his name to be so openly associated with this organization.
Please take a look at the following excerpt from Jonah Goldberg’s book “Liberal Fascism” for information about the racist and eugenicist origins of Planned Parenthood, then ask yourself again why in the world our president would “bless” the cruel underlying efforts of an organization like this.
Do you want him to spend your family’s hard earned tax dollars funding this culture of death? Surely there are people of good conscience within Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion centers who will feel the imperative within themselves to find other ways to help women in their time of need. There are so many better answers than merely eliminating the most precious, promising ingredient we have on earth – innocent human life. May efforts to cull the defenseless and vulnerable not be “blessed,” instead may God bless those who decide that respecting a culture of life in America is the only way to get us out of the mess we’re in.
Margaret Sanger, whose American Birth Control League became Planned Parenthood, was the founding mother of the birth-control movement. She is today considered a liberal saint, a founder of modern feminism, and one of the leading lights of the Progressive pantheon. Gloria Feldt of Planned Parenthood proclaims, “I stand by Margaret Sanger’s side,” leading “the organization that carries on Sanger’s legacy.” Planned Parenthood’s first black president, Faye Wattleton — Ms. magazine’s “Woman of the Year” in 1989 — said that she was “proud” to be “walking in the footsteps of Margaret Sanger.” Planned Parenthood gives out annual Maggie Awards to individuals and organizations who advance Sanger’s cause. Recipients are a Who’s Who of liberal icons, from the novelist John Irving to the producers of NBC’s West Wing. What Sanger’s liberal admirers are eager to downplay is that she was a thoroughgoing racist who subscribed completely to the views of E. A. Ross and other “raceologists.” Indeed, she made many of them seem tame.
Sanger was born into a poor family of eleven children in Corning, New York, in 1879. In 1902 she received her degree as a registered nurse. In 1911 she moved to New York City, where she fell in with the transatlantic bohemian avant-garde of the burgeoning fascist moment. “Our living-room,” she wrote in her autobiography, “became a gathering place where liberals, anarchists, Socialists and I.W.W.’s could meet.” A member of the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party, she participated in all the usual protests and demonstrations. In 1912 she started writing what amounted to a sex-advice column for the New York Call, dubbed “What Every Girl Should Know.” The overriding theme of her columns was the importance of contraception.
A disciple of the anarchist Emma Goldman — another eugenicist — Sanger became the nation’s first “birth control martyr” when she was arrested for handing out condoms in 1917. In order to escape a subsequent arrest for violating obscenity laws, she went to England, where she fell under the thrall of Havelock Ellis, a sex theorist and ardent advocate of forced sterilization. She also had an affair with H. G. Wells, the self-avowed champion of “liberal fascism.” Her marriage fell apart early, and one of her children — whom she admitted to neglecting — died of pneumonia at age four. Indeed, she always acknowledged that she wasn’t right for family life, admitting she was not a “fit person for love or home or children or anything which needs attention or consideration.”
Under the banner of “reproductive freedom,” Sanger subscribed to nearly all of the eugenic views discussed above. She sought to ban reproduction of the unfit and regulate reproduction for everybody else. She scoffed at the soft approach of the “positive” eugenicists, deriding it as mere “cradle competition” between the fit and the unfit. “More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief issue of birth control,” she frankly wrote in her 1922 book The Pivot of Civilization. (The book featured an introduction by Wells, in which he proclaimed, “We want fewer and better children…and we cannot make the social life and the world-peace we are determined to make, with the ill-bred, ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens that you inflict on us.” Two civilizations were at war: that of progress and that which sought a world “swamped by an indiscriminate torrent of progeny.”
A fair-minded person cannot read Sanger’s books, articles, and pamphlets today without finding similarities not only to Nazi eugenics but to the dark dystopias of the feminist imagination found in such allegories as Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale. As editor of The Birth Control Review, Sanger regularly published the sort of hard racists we normally associate with Goebbels or Himmler. Indeed, after she resigned as editor, The Birth Control Review ran articles by people who worked for Goebbels and Himmler. For example, when the Nazi eugenics program was first getting wide attention, The Birth Control Review was quick to cast the Nazis in a positive light, giving over its pages for an article titled “Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need,” by Ernst Rüdin, Hitler’s director of sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. In 1926 Sanger proudly gave a speech to a KKK rally in Silver Lake, New Jersey.
One of Sanger’s closest friends and influential colleagues was the white supremacist Lothrop Stoddard, author of The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy. In the book he offered his solution for the threat posed by the darker races: “Just as we isolate bacterial invasions, and starve out the bacteria, by limiting the area and amount of their food supply, so we can compel an inferior race to remain in its native habitat.” When the book came out, Sanger was sufficiently impressed to invite him to join the board of directors of the American Birth Control League.
Let us never forget, Margaret Sanger, the darling of the democrat party to this day, called Negroes “human weeds” as saw abortion as a way to eliminate the entire black race. Pure.Unadulterated.Evil.
On Monday, President Obama gave a demagogic speech urging Congress to pass gun control legislation. In doing so, he asked a hypothetical question, “what’s more important to you–our children or an A grade from the gun lobby?” True to form, the President posed a false choice. Ironically, in survey research and legal proceedings, the type of question the President posed is known as a double barreled question, meaning the potential answers are not mutually exclusive. Protecting children and the second amendment are not mutually exclusive. Many NRA-backed politicians and many NRA members fight for the second amendment in part because they wish to be able to defend their children in the same way that the Secret Service is able to defend the President’s children.
How about a question that isn’t double barreled, Mr. President and your gun control allies? What’s more important to you–our children or a Grade A from the abortion lobby? NARAL Pro-Choice America grades politicians on how “pro-choice” they vote, they and endorse candidates. President Obama received their endorsement for President twice, even before Hillary Clinton dropped out of the race in 2008. Obama is actually more supportive of abortion than NARAL. In 2006, NARAL did not oppose the Born Alive Infant Protection Act that protected children who survived an abortion. While the Senate approved this by a unanimous voice vote, a nearly identical bill had been presented in the Illinois legislature a few years prior, and Obama opposed it as an Illinois state senator.
NARAL has other allies outside of elected office. Planned Parenthood sees NARAL as a “partner for women’s health and rights”. Despite the claim that these organizations support women’s rights, both have opposed a ban on sex-selected abortion. To them, it is fine for a woman to choose to have an abortion simply because her unborn baby is a girl, yet they claim to stand for women’s rights? In their annual report released in January, Planned Parenthood indicated that they performed a record number of abortions in 2011 and nearly a million abortions from when President Obama took office in 2009 through the end of 2011. The media are pro-choice in their coverage of these horrors of abortion, and they often choose not to cover it. Meanwhile, some media outlets choose to consider children as collectively “ours” as society, not as children who belong to their parents. First things first, however, in order for children to “belong to us “or to their parents, they cannot belong to the medical waste bin. What’s more important to you?
Lila Rose is my hero. She is a tireless advocate for those who can’t advocate for themselves. She works day and night to stop the barbaric practice of abortion and the genocide it’s brought about.
Kevin Scholla conducts a powerful interview in this episode of SarahNET Radio.
Plus, fantastic news from Sarah Steelman!
Lila Rose, President of Live Action is on The Palin Radio Update with Kevin Scholla! This amazing young woman has dedicated herself to building a culture of life and ending abortion. Lila and Kevin discuss where we stand today in the fight for life, they examine the case of Savita Halappanavar, and they look at the great respect for life demonstrated by Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin.
Also, Todd and Governor Palin offer Hanukkah wishes to those celebrating the Festival of Lights. Plus, Sarah Palin addresses the unspeakable tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. SarahNET Radio’s Steel Resolve, our weekly commentary from Sarah Steelman is featured as well. This week’s piece is a ‘must hear’, as Steelman delivers a major announcement. Tune in! SarahNET Radio is ON DEMAND and available for DOWNLOAD anytime! http://www.sarahnetradio.net
I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion.
~ Jessica delBalzo
By Gary P Jackson
There is evil, then there is evil. Looking at the writings of Jessica delBalzo, I’d say she is plenty evil.
I have never understood progressives and their culture of death. These people value their ability to slaughter innocent children [on an industrial scale] more than anything in the world.
A pro-abortion activist writing at one of the leading pro-abortion websites is admitting what many in the pro-life movement has always known but what leading defenders of abortion refuse to admit. Until now.
Jessica DelBalzo, an activist writer from Flemington, New Jersey who has written for numerous progressive websites, puts her extreme pro-abortion views on display at RH Reality Check, where she candidly admits in a headline, “I Love Abortion: Implying Otherwise Accomplishes Nothing for Women’s Rights.”
“I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion,” DelBalzo declares.
The pro-abortion activist categorically opposes even the “safe, legal and rare” mantra that pro-abortion politicians like Bill Clinton have used to appear to be more moderate or mainstream on abortion and that even former NARAL president Kate Michelman used to make her organization’s position appear less polemic.
As Delbalzo writes, “And I bristle every time a fellow activist uses a trendy catch-phrase or rallying cry meant to placate pro-lifers. The first of these, ‘Make abortion safe, legal, and rare!’ has been used for decades as a call for abortion rights.”
“Safe and legal are concepts I fully support, but rare is something I cannot abide. I understand the theoretical mindset: it is better for a woman to prevent an unwanted pregnancy than to bear the physical and financial burden of an abortion. While my own abortion involved very little pain and a minimal financial expense, one which my ex-boyfriend was willing to share with me, even I can admit that using condoms or the pill is preferable to eight weeks of nausea and weight gain,” she writes. “However, there is no need to suggest that abortion be rare. To say so implies a value judgement [sic], promoting the idea that abortion is somehow distasteful or immoral and should be avoided. Even with affordable, accessible birth control, there will be user errors, condoms that break, moments of spontaneity. The best contraceptive access in the world won’t change the fact that we are merely human and imperfect in our routines.”
She also admits: “Similarly, I’ve heard reproductive rights activists claim that ‘no one likes abortion,’ in an attempt to find common ground with anti-choicers. While it may be true that no one likes the physical act of having an abortion (any more than she may like her yearly mammogram, life-saving chemotherapy, or temporarily uncomfortable dental surgery), a great many women like abortion itself.”
With CNN and Gallup polls showing a majority of Americans want all or most abortions made illegal, this puts the pro-abortion activist in a tiny minority of Americans who want abortion legal throughout pregnancy for any reason without apology.
Just reading about this woman turns my stomach.
As if this isn’t vile enough, del Balzo is the acting president of something called Adoption: Legalized Lies , a group that discourages adoptions. Looking at their website, Anti-Adoption.org, I am both confused and bewildered.
If anyone is encouraging you to surrender your baby to adoption, please contact us by phone or email us. Our volunteers have experienced adoption in their own lives, and they can tell you what it feels like to be adopted or surrender your own child. We’ll also help you find the support you need to keep your baby – the best thing for both of you!
Don’t let anyone tell you that adoption is the “right choice” or the “loving option” for your baby. YOU are the only mother or father your baby has, and no one will be able to take your place in his or her life. People who try to convince you to surrender your baby are probably in a position to get something out of the adoption for themselves – either money or your child himself.
Other people may tell you that you’ll be “giving a wonderful gift” to an infertile couple – this is NOT your responsibility. Your only job is to be the best mom or dad you can be for your baby. Your child isn’t going to want or accept any substitute for the real thing!
Being young or unmarried or poor will not make you a bad parent, and we will help you overcome any obstacles that you face along the way. The most important thing is that you be there for your child the way that no one else can.
Please email us. Let us know how we can help you, and we will!
I don’t even know how to respond to this. Evidently, in the sick minds of these people, you should either keep your child, or ritualistically kill it. The idea of allowing a loving couple to adopt an unwanted child is simply out of the question.
We ofter hear that liberalism is a mental disorder. I present this woman and her group as Exhibit A.
Never stand between a democrat and their right to slaughter an innocent child. The only thing that will piss them off more is standing in their way of defending some cop killing thug from the death penalty!
This lovely example of democrat thought is Oklahoma State Senator Judy McIntyre. The occasion is a rally AGAINST pending “personhood” legislation. You know, because declaring human being a person is just downright evil! The sign the good Senator is holding reads, and I quote: “IF I WANTED THE GOVERNMENT IN MY WOMB, I’D FUCK A SENATOR!”
A couple of points. First, what does murdering an innocent human being have to do with “reproductive rights?” I don’t think Republicans, or any one else is trying to stop anyone from reproducing, though after seeing this woman in action, I wonder if her real problem is the lack of opportunities to reproduce.
Second, being a democrat, the Senator most certainly DOES want government in her womb. I’m sure she is all for government mandating contraception, and you KNOW she can’t wait to get her some ObamaCare, which will be in her womb, and everywhere else. When those death panels kick in I wonder if she’ll rethink her position on abortion, or does she think she’s special and will escape all of that?
Besides the militancy of the pro-death cult, I simply don’t get the overwhelming need of these people to slaughter children. It’s one of the most barbaric acts our society engages in. With few exceptions, there are no legitimate medical reasons to kill a baby in this manner. None. And yet, these people will fight to protect this “right” before they will fight for anything else.
The libertarian in me understands the concept of wanting the government to stay out of one’s life, but that’s not what these people really want. In fact, they want to control every aspect of your lives. They want to control what you eat, what you drive, and where you live. If democrats had their way they would micromanage ever single facet of your life. It’s who they are and what they do.
No, all of this talk about “stay out of my womb” is just the theater of the absurd.
It boggles the mind that someone would go absolute crazy over a recognition that a person is, in fact, a person. The only thing that scrambles the brain more is the fact that we need an actual law to state what should be self evident.
By now we should be used to politicians who are never what they seem. Rick Santorum is being hailed as the newest Conservative savior. I’m thinking folks need to re-think that whole mind set.
I know this will anger our readers who support Rick, but it would not be in keeping with our blog’s mission to just ignore all of this. We hammer Mitt Romney for being a squish, and a flip-flopper, but always ignore the election year conversions of the rest of the field. Newt Gingrich was also hailed as our “last best hope” until people remembered that he’s really a Big Government progressive.
I’ve been going through Santorum’s voting record and will be publishing a report that readers can then search it all for themselves. So far, I’m not convinced Santorum is the Conservative he says he is, but well look at his record as a whole in a future post.
For now, this little gem has come up from Santorum’s first run for the Senate. Frankly, it sounds EXACTLY like the way Mitt Romney sounded during his failed attempt to unseat Teddy Kennedy:
Santorum, who describes himself in his campaign manual as a “progressive conservative,” and who did not have a firm position on abortion.
Santorum said he had always opposed government funding of abortions, but “beyond that I tried as much as I could to dance around the issue, not really take a position on it.”
Far cry from the “crusader” we see on the stump today. Read more here.
Now it’s OK for candidates to evolve. Especially when they evolve in the right direction, but we still have to look at people’s motivations. Character still matters.
We’ll be doing more vetting on Santorum as the days go by.
![sarah-marvelous-eyes-trig[2]](https://thespeechatimeforchoosing.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/sarah-marvelous-eyes-trig2.jpg)
A Time For Choosing 
