Tag Archives: democrat party

Spitting on Their Graves: Democrats Leave Benghazi Hearing Before Testimony From Families of Victims

white-house-benghazi-e1351455971515

By Gary P Jackson

This is despicable!

From Katie Pavlich:

During the second portion of a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing about Benghazi Thursday on Capitol Hill, the majority of Democrats on the Committee left the room and refused to listen to the testimony of Patricia Smith and Charles Woods. Ms. Smith is the mother of Sean Smith, an information management officer killed in the 9/11 Benghazi attack. Charles Woods is the father of Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, who was also killed.

The far side of the room, shown empty in the photo, belongs to the Democrats. The only Democrats who stayed were Ranking Member Elijah Cummings and Rep. Jackie Speier.

Friends, I can’t say what I really want to, because it would violate our policy against excessive profanity. These democrats are the lowest of the low. They aren’t even pretending to give a damn about our brave men and women who lost their lives in service to America. May they all go straight to hell, and the sooner, the better.

Miss Liberty on Twitter said it best a few days ago, with this Hillary 2016 “campaign poster

https://twitter.com/TheUSARocks/status/380158273556447232

That thing needs to be posted all over the internet, all day, every day. We must NEVER forget!

benghazi-libya-coverup-obama-white-house-hillary-clinton-chris-stevens1

Benghazi 4

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under In The News, Politics

Illegal Alien Roy Naim, ‘Face of Immigration Reform,’ Held on Child Porn Charges

Roy Naim

https://twitter.com/TheDreamisNow/statuses/316334802666131457

Yes, let’s MEET Roy Naim…

He’s an “American,” just not legally, and well, he’s being held, without bail, on child pornography charges.

From the New York Daily News:

[emphasis mine]

A Brooklyn man featured in a Time magazine cover story on immigration reform was arrested Wednesday on child pornography charges.

Roy Naim, 29, who bills himself as an immigration activist, allegedly downloaded at least three illicit videos featuring underage boys from the website of another sicko based in Louisiana who made the porn, a complaint filed in Brooklyn Federal Court says.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Saritha Komatireddy said the defendant was soliciting others to produce kiddie porn and was a risk to flee to Israel.

Naim emigrated from Israel at age 3 and is an undocumented alien. He has actively lobbied Congress on immigration issues, his lawyer said.

He’s still in limbo. . . He wants to be an American citizen,” lawyer Richard Finkel said.

Naim was one of 35 undocumented immigrants featured in Time’s June 25, 2012, issue, under the headline “We Are Americans.”

He was ordered held without bail.

Well, for one thing, no, this criminal is NOT an American. It’s hateful to call him an American. It dishonors those who have come here legally, and helped make America great.

I don’t care that this alleged child molester was brought here illegally by his criminal parents. The fact is, he is here illegally, and should not be.

If President Obama, his democrat party, and frankly, far too many treasonous bastards in the Republican Party, get their way, “dreamers” like Roy Naim will be welcomed with open arms.

As Americans it’s time we stop tolerating this nonsense, and demand Congress act, and get these unwelcome criminals out of our country. I don’t care how you came here illegally, how long you’ve been here, or what kind of “roots” you have put down. If you came to America without our permission, you DO NOT belong here, and have no business here. Period.

There are thousands of Roy Naims in America. Murderers, rapists, child molesters, and more. All of them belong in their country of origin, not the United States.

Twitchy has collected the tweets of democrat activists proclaiming their love and support of this child molester here.

1 Comment

Filed under In The News, Politics

Have Obama, The Democrats, and Race Hustlers Finally Killed Dr Martin Luther King’s Dream?

Martin-Luther-King-Jr-Character-Quotes

It’s in the best interest of the American people that we reject this hatred and division, and drive those who would destroy our nation, and Dr King’s dream, out of our society forever.

By Gary P Jackson

Dr. Martin Luther King,Jr. was, and is, an American icon. A man of God, Dr. King had a simple dream. A dream that one day his children and their children would be considered equal, that all of God’s children would live together in peace and harmony. That little black boys and little black girls would be able to have the same opportunities as little white boys and little white girls.

Throughout history major social changes have come about through revolution, and sadly, war. Being a man of God, Dr King sought to bring about significant change through peaceful dialogue, rather than bloody fighting. Slowly but surely, Dr King was winning, and would have no doubt triumphed in the end, had he not been murdered on that April day in 1968 in Memphis.

To me, on this 50th anniversary of Dr King’s “I have a Dream” speech, one of the most important speeches in human history, is not how far we … as a society …. have come, but how far backward we have slipped. Today, as much as I want to celebrate Dr King, I am saddened by the world we find ourselves in.

One of the key concepts Dr King provided for the world in his speech was the idea that men and women should be judged, not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character. It’s a simple idea, based in the word of God. The idea that nothing matters more in a person’s life than character is as old as time itself. It goes back to the days when a man’s word was his bond. A handshake was better than a written contract. A person’s good character gave them a certain standing that nothing else could displace. Not money. Not even political power.

Those of you who are my age, and older, know that while looking at character, before prejudging, was pretty standard among people of the same race, that wasn’t the case when looking at people of other races. There were certain pre-concieved notions and assumptions that always came into play. It caused far too many tensions and conflicts. Most based on ignorance, not facts.

Now since we are all human, there will always be certain biases and prejudices, but the notion that a person’s race automatically makes them a certain type of man or woman, is not only ridiculous, it’s hateful. One thing we know about people, is there are good and bad ones everywhere. The only way to really know which an individual is, is through evaluating their character.

On Saturday many gathered in Washington to celebrate Dr King’s speech. I was deeply troubled to see so many dishonor Dr King by their presence. Seeing despicable race hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton take the stage and proclaim allegiance to Dr King, and his dream, made me physically sick to my stomach. These two, and many others, including our current president, have made it all about skin color. They preach hatred and sew racial tension on an almost daily basis.

In fact, the liberal democrat party and it’s disciples have used skin color, and false cries of racism, in order to hide the lack of quality and character of those who are being criticized for their actions. America elected Barack Obama, not once, but twice as president. That alone would tend to show America is not a racist country, but the American people are assaulted daily with accusations of hatred and racism, for simply what we have done since the days of George Washington: Criticize those in power!

False cries of racism assault us daily, and are nothing more than a tactic to push an anti-American political agenda. Even situations, like the trial of George Zimmerman, which was investigated to death, and no racial motive found, have been turned into an opportunity to stoke hatred and divide the American people along racial lines.

It’s usually radical liberal white men and women in the democrat party that accuse critics of the president, and any radical left wing black of being racists. This in itself is a very nasty form of racism. It’s like these white liberals think the blacks are incapable, that they cannot stand on their own. There has to be screams of racism, to shut critics down, rather than have Obama and others stand and be questioned. Some call that the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” But the fact is, Obama and others play right along, because it is such a powerful way to shut up the timid, who fear being called a racist, and lack the courage to fight back. It’s used to shield Obama and others from being held accountable for anything they do.

It’s destroying the nation.

Being called a racist in our society is a real death sentence to anyone’s career, unless, of course, you are a good liberal, then you can spew hate and racism all you want, and never have to be assaulted. Liberals use this crutch to destroy their political enemies, and divide the American people.

A divided people, is an easily conquered people. The democrats understand the best way to get and keep power is to keep the population divided and at each others throats. What better way than to scream “racism” 24/7 any time someone says anything critical of the president, or other radical democrats who are destroying the American way of life. Couple that with massive ignorance and a solid effort of disinformation by the media, and you get to where we are now, a nation perilously divided, and a vile political ideology in control and mostly unchecked.

It’s gotten so ridiculous with Obama, that merely calling him by his name has been deemed racist by hate-mongers like NBC’s Chris Matthews.

We all know the real history of the democrat party. It’s a party with a history of institutionalized racism. The democrat party created the KKK after the Civil War as a domestic terror unit. It’s job was to intimidate voters who might be inclined to vote Republican. As it happens, blacks voted overwhelmingly Republican, and were specific targets of this terror group. The democrat party also wrote Jim Crow laws, and otherwise worked to discriminate and segregate.

Now we’ll here from democrats who’ll claim all of that has changed and even hear the bullshit notion that somehow all the racist democrats “flipped” and became Republicans, and all the Liberty loving Republicans became democrats. Fact is, most democrats DID vote for Ronald Reagan en masse both in 1980 and 1984, but that was purely because of Jimmy Carter’s disastrous presidency, and Reagan’s success at turning our nation around and moving us in the right direction. It was the economy, stupid! We’ve not seen a mass exodus of voters, to either party, since.

There are plenty of examples, but the most egregious is the fact that the democrats had one of the KKK’s highest ranking members in the United States Senate until 2010, when he finally passed away. Robert Byrd, of West Virgina, was a vile racist who fought long and hard against Civil Rights, was held up as one of the elders of the democrat party.

Don’t even get me started on how rabid liberalism has destroyed the black family, and how that has led so many blacks into poverty, that’s another long discussion for another time.

This, however, is about Dr King, his leadership, and how the democrat party has hijacked and dishonored this great man. Dr King was a man of God and thus, pro-life. The idea of slaughtering innocent children through abortion was hateful to Dr King. Though groups like Planned Parenthood have tried to claim Dr King as their own, he rejected them when he was alive.

It was disgusting to see race hustlers Jackson and Sharpton speak at the Washington rally for many reasons, but knowing that both are viciously pro-abortion, may be the biggest insult to Dr King, and the American people.

Abortion is a religion to the democrat party. The slaughter of children is their holy sacrament, and Planned Parenthood is their holy church. Abortion is the one thing democrats will fight to the bitter end to keep. Democrats also celebrate Margaret Sanger. Hillary Clinton is a former Margaret Sanger Award winner. This award is given to those who support the unconditional murder of innocent children.

To know Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood’s founder, is to know vile racism, hatred, and vicious anti-Americanism. Sanger was a communist, and staunchly anti-American. Back in her time, these people were called “progressives” now we simply call them liberals.

Sanger was a eugenicist, a popular study of the day, and something gaining popularity again in liberal circles. Sanger and her contemporaries thought it possible to create a “master race” through, among other things, ethnic cleansing. To put it plainly, Sanger’s goal was to wipe out the Negro race, members of which she called “human weeds.”

Today under the full sanction, and with great celebration, 500,000 innocent black children are slaughtered annually, in abortion factories around the country. This is ethnic cleansing, the likes of, our world has never known.

Sanger’s plan to wipe out the entire race has failed, but with tens of millions of innocent black babies slaughtered, one has to wonder how many Dr Kings, and other potential American leaders, our nation has been deprived of, thanks to this democrat policy of ethnic cleansing.

It’s disgusting on so many levels that democrats claim Dr King as their own, especially as many of those doing it, were alive and active during his time.

Many of those hailed as heroes in the democrat party, saw Dr King as the enemy and sought to destroy him.

Along with Bobby Kennedy and J Edgar Hoover, LBJ spread nasty rumors about Dr King, in an effort to discredit him to his people.

Straight out of Alinsky’s book, they accused Dr King of adultery. Which is rich coming from a Kennedy, as they are notorious for sleeping with anyone or anything with a pulse! Both JFK and Bobby were notorious adulterers, and both have been linked to the death of Marilyn Monroe. Teddy Kennedy, a slobbering drunk, allowed a woman he was having an affair with to drown, while he crawled home and slept one off, after driving the car he and Mary Jo Kopechne were in, off a bridge.

The democrats also accused Dr King of being a communist. [back when people understood socialism was evil] Bobby Kennedy authorized the FBI to conduct wire taps on Dr King. Of course Dr King was NOT a communist, but to this day, there are racists who believe he was, thanks to Bobby Kennedy and the democrat party.

I also find this rather ironic, as well. Though Dr King was NOT a communist, and NEVER worked to undermine the United States, we now know that Senator Teddy Kennedy WAS a traitor, and openly conspired to work with the Soviets during the Reagan years, in order to stop Reagan’s strong anti-socialist agenda. An agenda that eventually won the cold war!

According to reports, even Jackie Kennedy had nothing but hatred for Dr King calling him terrible,” “tricky,” and a “phony.” And yet, today, the democrat party leaders want to claim Dr King and pretend he, and they, were all working together. Disgusting, to say the least!

While the democrats today use cries of racism to shield Obama and others from being held accountable for their actions, they have divided America like no other time in the last century. Racial tensions are high, and America is strongly divided. Of course, this is the democrat’s plan. Keep Americans [of all races and creeds] at each others throats. Damned good distraction while they rape and plunder our nation.

We know that Dr King was a Conservative and a Republican. That is historic fact. Now if he were alive today, he might be like many Conservatives, and disavow the GOP, not over racial issues, but the party’s lack of actual Conservatism, but I have no doubt in my mind that, if he were alive today, Dr King would be one of our strongest voices for Conservatism, morality, and the Rule of Law. Dr King preached Liberty and Freedom, for all.

Today the democrat party dishonors the memory and legacy of Dr King by using hate and screams of racism to silence those who disagree with their dishonest, criminal, anti-American agenda. It’s in the American DNA to criticize those in power, and to continually fight to maintain Liberty and Freedom. What the democrats are doing goes against everything America stands for.

We have an out of control, completely lawless White House and federal government. This isn’t because of the race of one man, or millions of men, it’s because of rabid liberalism!

I think I can speak for all Conservatives when I say I dislike Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a host of other nasty old white liberals, as much, if not more, than Barack Obama. When I see Obama I don’t see black. When I see Hillary, I don’t see white. When I look at these liberal democrats I see the red of socialism, the red of communism. The red of evil.

As an American and a Conservative, as well as an admirer of Dr King, I choose to honor Dr King by judging Obama, Clinton, and every other politician, in either party, not by the color of their skin, but the quality of their character. And man, is there a lack of quality of character in Washington!

It’s hard not to be angry these days. Anti-American liberals not only run the democrat party, but have also infected the GOP. We are a nation with a lawless government. A nation completely out of control, run by men and women of low character. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Dr Martin Luther King, Jr had a wonderful dream. A dream of a nation where all of her people lived in harmony and content. A nation were black men and white men worked side by side for the betterment of all. Since day one, the democrat party tried to undermine Dr King and his dream. They sought to discredit him and destroy him. The hatred ginned up by democrat leaders eventually got Dr King assassinated.

Today, Dr King’s dream is all but dead. Instead of being allowed to judge our leaders by their moral character, it’s demanded of us to only look at skin color, and under fear of being attacked, not dare criticize our president or any of his policies. This exactly the opposite of Dr King’s plan for United States, and the world, and it is a huge setback in our nation’s history. It’s vile and evil.

It’s also un-American.

As a nation we MUST come together. Rabid liberalism is destroying America. Rabid liberalism has brought all of civilization to the brink of destruction. Rabid liberalism doesn’t just hurt white people, or black people, it’s hurts ALL people, no matter their race, color, or creed.

On this day, as we remember Dr King, and one of the most important speeches, and ideas, in human history, it’s time to reject democrat racism, and democrat hate-mongering. It’s time for the American people to unite and stand strong. We must defeat liberalism. We must defeat those who spew hatred 24/7. We must fight these evils with every ounce of our souls. There is no reason why Dr King’s dream cannot become reality. All we have to do is defeat those who use skin color to deflect criticism and cover up for crimes against humanity. These are the true racists!

Dr King’s dream was that of an essential man. A man who understood that no society could function in an atmosphere of hate and bigotry. No people can stand when divided. Dr King saw a society filled with ignorance and sought to educate and inform.

For liberalism to survive, ignorance must prevail, so the democrats fought to stop Dr King in his time. Today, and every day moving forward, we must commit ourselves to wiping out ignorance, to help educate those who are uniformed and misinformed. We must commit ourselves to fighting evil, and those who would use race and creed to divide is, while they build their power to use against us all.

The democrats have NOT won this battle, but they have certainly halted all progress toward Dr King’s dream.

It’s now up to us, Dr King’s fellow Conservatives, to take up his struggle, and hold those who divide us accountable. We cannot allow the hate and the ridiculous screams of “racism” to silence us. We must double our efforts to make sure all men and women are judged by the content of their character, and held accountable for their actions.

It’s up to all of us to carry Dr King’s dream in our hearts, and make that dream come true in our lifetime.

Race hustlers like Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton have turned their brand of hatred and division into a multi-million dollar industry. It is in theirs and the entire liberal movement’s best interest to keep American’s at each others throats, and the fires of hatred stoked.

It’s in the best interest of the American people that we reject this hatred and division, and drive those who would destroy our nation, and Dr King’s dream, out of our society forever.

We are blessed as a nation that such a man as Dr King was among us. We are blessed that we were able to hear his message of love and hope. Now it’s time we all work together to make that dream a reality and defeat those who have always worked to stop it.

For America to survive, Dr King’s dream MUST prevail.

1 Comment

Filed under In The News, Politics

Celebrated Late Term Abortionist Describes Murdering Children Like “Putting Meat in a Crock Pot”

carhart crying

LeRoy Carhart cries as he disgustingly compares fellow late-term abortionist George Tiller to Civil Rights Icon Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.

By Gary P Jackson

In America abortions are neither “rare” nor “safe” no matter the talking points regularly spewed by members of the democrat party.

Like the racist eugenicist and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, LeRoy Carhart is a celebrated member of the liberal movement. It seems the easiest way to became a celebrity liberal in America is to have a real blood-lust for murdering innocent children. And Carhart has an exceptionally vile lust for blood. A well known and highly beloved [by democrats anyway] late term abortionist, Carhart has a reputation of murdering babies right up to the mother’s due date!

In LeRoy Carhart, you have a monster of the same magnitude of Kermit Gosnell and Josef Mengele.

Carhart has been a frequent “go-to-guy” for putting a smiley face on genocide. That is until he killed Jennifer McKenna Morbelli and her daughter Madison Leigh in February.

morbelli-3_4_r536_c534

What’s really maddening is Madison Leigh was a wanted child, but Morbelli, a married teacher, was told there were some “fetal anomalies” and evidently talked into murdering her child at 33 weeks. Modern medicine has made a baby viable outside the womb at around 20 weeks, something that makes late term abortions particularly vile, and inhuman.

Full disclosure, I was born prematurely to a middle aged mother who had multiple miscarriages over the years and gave birth to a daughter who was dead, two years before I was born. I spent a number of weeks in an incubator and was a very sick kid. 53 years later, here I am! I’m grateful I was born in a time when Americans didn’t tolerate the slaughter of innocent children, let alone celebrate it, as liberals do now!

Jill Stanek writes extensively about the tragic deaths of Jennifer and Madison Leigh, and notes that Carhart has been involved in two Supreme Court cases:

Carhart was the plaintiff in two U.S. Supreme Court cases, Stenberg v. Carhart in 2000, which he won and which forced the State of Nebraska to overturn its ban against partial birth abortions; and Gonzales v. Carhart in 2007, which he lost and which allowed the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban to stand.

I can’t even fathom someone being so sub-human as to go to court to preserve the right to slaughter innocent and viable children. These people really do follow in the tradition of monsters like Mengele. It’s sickening that our society allows this to exist.

Read Stanek’s complete account of this evil monster here.

Operation Rescue notes this isn’t the first woman who has died at the hands of Carhart. In 2005 Christin Gilbert died in Wichita, Kansas. About Carhart they write: [emphasis mine]

Germantown, MD – A 29-year old woman died yesterday as the result of fatal complications suffered during an abortion at 33 weeks that was done by LeRoy Carhart at Germantown Reproductive Health Center in Germantown, Maryland. Information about the incident comes from an extremely credible anonymous source.

The woman, who came for a third trimester abortion from out-of-state, arrived at GRHC on Sunday and was seen by pro-life activists every day through Wednesday. Witnesses said she appeared “pale and weak.”

Early Thursday morning, the woman began suffering chest pain and other discomforts. Her attempts to reach Carhart were unsuccessful. The woman was taken by her family from her hotel to a nearby hospital emergency room at approximately 5:00 a.m. Efforts by hospital staff to contact Carhart or get informational assistance from the abortion clinic were unsuccessful.

The patient suffered massive internal bleeding into her abdominal cavity. She slipped into a Code Blue condition approximately six times before finally succumbing to her injuries at around 9:30 a.m. The case has been placed with the Medical Examiner for further investigation.

This tragic incident ironically occurred the same day that another medical emergency took place at a New Mexico abortion clinic involving long-time Carhart associate Shelley Sella. At the time of that incident, a politically motivated Medical Board in New Mexico was voting to clear Sella of negligence charges, related to a botched third trimester abortion using the same risky late-term abortion method employed by Carhart. This dangerous out-patient abortion process includes long periods of time where the patient is unmonitored while taking strong doses of a drug that causes unpredictable and sometimes violent contractions.

The avoidable death of this young woman dramatically illustrates the dangers of third trimester abortions that are done outside of the safety of obstetrical standards,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue and Pro-life Nation. “In 2005, Carhart was also involved in the death of Christin Gilbert, who died after a third trimester abortion in Wichita, Kansas. It is time for medical boards to put an end to these horrifically dangerous and barbaric third trimester abortions. If they do not, we can only expect Carhart and his associates to send more women to the morgue.”

Christin Gilbert

sisters2

Carhart has been celebrated universally among the Hollywood crowd, and walked the red carpet at the Sundance festival, celebrating the pro-baby murdering film, After Tiller.

Carhart at Sundance Murder Incorporated

He’s also close to Kathleen Sebilius.

Ken Klukowski from Breitbart News wrote back in February: [emphasis mine]

Because of Carhart’s national status, nearly 2,000 pro-life demonstrators reportedly attended a prayer event outside Carhart’s Germantown abortion clinic when it opened. He moved to this suburb of Washington, D.C. because pro-life legislation forced the closure of his Nebraska abortion clinic. The 2000 Supreme Court case bearing his name was his challenge to Nebraska’s then-recent law prohibiting partial-birth abortion.

Enter Kathleen Sebelius. When she was governor of Tiller’s home state of Kansas, Sebelius hosted Tiller and Carhart for dinner at the governor’s mansion. She wanted to honor them for the work they were doing, which largely consisted of late-term abortions on children who could all survive outside their mothers’ wombs, killed by a procedure so gruesome that the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan—a pro-choice Democrat representing New York—condemned it as “infanticide.

This is the same Sebelius who now, as secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is the lead federal official for taking over the U.S. healthcare system with Obamacare. She is also the official who issued the HHS Mandate—the federal regulation requiring almost all employers in America with 50+ employees to cover abortion-related services, which is now slowly heading toward the Supreme Court for violating the religious freedoms of people of faith.

According to the pro-life group’s statement, Carhart’s late-term abortion procedure takes four days to complete, and Morbelli looked “pale and weak” on her return visits. At 5 AM on Feb. 7th, she was in intense pain; the family tried to contact Carhart to deal with his patient’s medical emergency, but he could not be reached. The family took Morbelli to nearby Shady Grove Hospital in Rockville, Maryland. She died later that morning from blood loss and hemorrhagic shock.

The statement concludes: “On the very same day that this woman died, the [Maryland] Department of Health and Mental Hygiene posted on their website that they issued a license to Carhart’s clinic to perform abortions…

Remember, President Barack Obama, a man who fought against a law in Illinois that would have forced doctors to save babies born alive, during an attempted murder through abortion, was just at the big Planned Parenthood celebration and asked God to bless these murderers.

I say God help us! No nation that allows the slaughter of innocent children on an industrial scale [over 300,000 a year by Planned Parenthood alone, around 1.2 MILLION a year total] as the United States does, deserves God’s blessings. We should all be deeply ashamed these animals are allowed to practice their “craft” in this once proud and righteous nation.

Live Action, sent two undercover reporters to Carhart’s slaughterhouse. Both of these women were told the babies would be killed while still in their wombs, and left there for three or four days, which would make the baby like “meat in a crock pot.”

God damn this man. God damn him to hell! God damn everyone who supports this slaughter of innocents in any way whatsoever. The way he so cavalierly describes the murder of an innocent child, and the process for removal of the dead baby makes me sick to my stomach.

Live action has produced a report: Inhuman: Undercover in America’s Late-Term Abortion Industry. This extensive report proves that Carhart is indeed worse than indicted murderer Kermit Gosnell, by a long shot.

The investigation has uncovered dangerous practices and the falsification of records.

Carhart is currently being investigated in the death of Jennifer Morbelli, who suffered massive internal bleeding after he performed a third-trimester abortion.

In 1993, Carhart promised the director of health of Nebraska that he would begin to adequately protect his
patients from infection and refrain from falsifying patient records. Carhart also agreed to stop talking on the phone or falling asleep during abortions.

In 2001, the University of Nebraska terminated Carhart’s adjunct professorship when it was discovered that he was donating the remains of babies he had aborted to their research departments.

Just four years ago, four former workers admitted to passing off medical care, abortion counseling, and prescriptions even though they were untrained; one had only a high school diploma.

These witnesses and testimony from patients who were coerced into illegal, post-viability abortions prompted undercover investigations by Operation Rescue into Carhart’s practice of falsifying fetal age.

Characteristically, Carhart’s ultrasound technician manipulated the pregnant investigator’s sonogram to give an apparent younger fetal age. The abortion of a post-viable baby was scheduled with Carhart. The clinic did not obtain a second physician’s consent, as mandated by Kansas law, and the abortion was scheduled for 25 weeks gestation, three weeks later than an abortion could legally be performed in Kansas.

The report goes on: [emphasis mine]

Carhart has long been known to fight hard for his grisly abortion procedures. Twice he has
gone to the Supreme Court to demand the legalization of his favorite method of partialbirth abortion, wherein a baby is mostly delivered and then his skull crushed and brain vacuumed out.

So Carhart’s callous disregard for our investigators’ babies comes as no surprise. He casually described the abortion as a “shot into the fetus” to ensure that “[i]t’ll be dead for two days before you deliver it.” He told her the injection also causes the baby to “[get] soft, like mushy [makes squishing sound], so you push it through… So it’s like putting meat in a crock pot.

If this method is unsuccessful, he would have to remove the baby “in pieces,” using, he joked, “a pickaxe, a drill bit.

Both investigators asked if Carhart’s abortions “hurt” the babies. He replied by arbitrarily inventing
his own parameters for when a fetus feels pain. “So, after about two to three weeks after birth… I think then they have pretty good knowledge of pain, but before that I’m not so sure that they do.”

In fact, there is wide consensus in the scientific community that babies feel acute pain by 20 weeks of gestation.

The report goes on to reveal how Carhart has seemingly no human feelings at all, and even seems to delight in the murder of innocent children.

Carhart also boasted to Live Action that he had performed “twenty-some-thousand” abortions
over 24 weeks,”
the point of viability defined by Roe v. Wade. Considering that only 10% of women who get an abortion after 13 weeks do so out of concern for their health, the vast majority of these abortions were probably performed on healthy babies and mothers.

Carhart also routinely lies to mothers about the risks involved in this monstrous ritual killing.

Read the entire report, if you can. It’s an eye opener.

The democrats and their media partners have done their best to cover-up, or lessen the impact of the Goznell murders. No way the blood thirsty radicals will admit that abortion, especially late-term abortion, is murder, and no way they want Americans to find out that Goznell was the norm, rather than the exception in the abortion industry.

These abortionists are heartless animals who really do seem to delight in mass murder. They are no different than the bombers in Boston or the Nazis who ran the death camps.

I know there are legitimate reasons to end a pregnancy, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. [and by definition, the child’s] But there no excuse for these late term murders of innocent and viable CHILDREN, and as we are learning the hard way, the mother is in far more danger of dying from a botched abortion by an incompetent “doctor” than the effects of pregnancy.

No civilization can survive, nor does it deserve to survive, that treats the least among them the way America treats it’s innocent and vulnerable. Our nation’s Declaration of Independence says all of us are entitled to “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” These barbaric animals, with the full and enthusiastic support of the democrat party and the current President of the United States, work to specifically deny these children their right to both Life and Liberty.

leroy-carhart-is-a-hero-pro-choice-abortion

Bloodthirsty, sub-human liberals hail late term abortionist/murderer LeRoy Carhart as a “hero

This is not the United States I was born into, nor the United States I want to see continue. We are a nation of decent human beings, for the most part, and it’s time all decent human beings stand up and stop the barbaric slaughter of innocent children. If we, as a nation can’t get this done, we, as a nation don’t deserve to continue.

7 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics

The John Does vs The Permanent Political Establishment

Gary Cooper Barbara Stanwyck Meet John Doe

By Gary P Jackson
Follow Gary on Twitter!

Sarah Palin has often said one of her favorite movies is the 1939 classic Mr Smith Goes to Washington. Directed by Frank Capra and starring Jimmy Stewart, the movie follows newly appointed Senator Jefferson Smith [Stewart] , a naive and idealistic young man. As the story unfolds, Senator Smith runs up against the political machine, massive corruption and cronyism.

Before taking office, Smith was the leader of the Boy Rangers a fictional group akin to the Boy Scouts of America. It’s his goal, as Senator, to create a national boys camp, a noble idea that turns into a battle. It’s a great movie that I firmly believe all Americans should see. Like all Capra films, it has a strong message.

It’s easy to understand why Sarah Palin loves this movie. Sarah is a proven reformer, having gone after questionable politicians since her earliest days as a member of the Wasilla, Alaska city council.

In a move that kinda mirrors the movie, after an unsuccessful bid to be Alaska’s Lt. Governor, Sarah, whose political star was definitely on the rise, was appointed by Governor Frank Murkowski as Chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. This is one of the most powerful positions in the state. It was here that Sarah uncovered massive corruption at almost every level.

After uncovering all of this corruption, Sarah went to the Governor and demanded action. After being told to let it go, she told the Governor to either get something done, or she would go to the media with the facts. This, of course led to Murkowski sending then Attorney General Gregg Renkes, who was also neck deep in his own corrupt dealings, to pay Sarah a visit, threatening her with legal consequences if she blew the whistle.

In the end, Sarah resigned from her high paying gig at the AOGCC and took on the entire corrupt Republican Party in Alaska. The rest is history. The FBI would eventually get involved, and two years later, months into Governor Palin’s term, corrupt Republicans were still being hauled off to prison.

It’s easy to see why Governor Palin relates to the struggles of Senator Smith. She’s lived the movie, and then some!

For me though, it’s another Capra film that hits all of the right notes. Meet John Doe is a wonderful film starring Gary Cooper and Barbara Stanwyck. I relate to the film because of the parallels between the film and what is going on between the Republican Party and the Tea Party today.

Full Disclosure: I’m a huge Gary Cooper fan, something helped along by the fact that he was my mother’s favorite actor, and who I’m named after. And I simply adore Barbara Stanwyck. She is one of the greatest actresses ever to appear on film, and one of the most beautiful. As such, I love every film both of them made.

It’s interesting to note that Cooper and Stanwyck, as well as actors Clark Gable, Ginger Rogers, John Wayne, and Irene Dunne [among others] were members of The Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals. Within Stanwyck’s online bio, the Internet Movie Database describes this group as “a rabidly right-wing political action group during the McCarthy-era ‘blacklisting’ period in the early and mid-1950s.” Wonderful actors and Conservative to boot. Good enough for me! If they were alive today they would likely be Tea Party members themselves. BTW, as we now know, MaCarthy was spot on!

Released in 1941, while America was still in shambles due to Roosevelt’s failed liberal policies, that turned a bad recession into what is now known as The Great Depression, the movie opens in the town’s newspaper office. The local newspaper has been bought out by oil tycoon D. B. Norton, deliciously played by Edward Arnold, and the first order of business is firing almost everyone, including popular columnist Ann Mitchell. [Stanwyck]

Angered, especially after being told to make sure her last column is done before she hits the door, Mitchell decides to leave a parting shot. She quickly types up a fictional letter to the editor in which a desperate, unemployed man, who calls himself “John Doe,” goes on and on about the state of the country, the political corruption, and the decline of the American way. As a gesture, this fictional “John Doe” promises to commit suicide by jumping off the city’s municipal building on New Year’s Eve.

Once published, the letter creates an uproar in the community. The new editor Henry Connell [James Gleason] summons Mitchell back. Connell figures the letter is bogus, and the town’s other newspaper is already saying as much. Ann’s a fast talker though and convinces Connell that his only course of action is to run with the story, as any admission that the whole thing was made up would harm the paper’s credibility. Mitchell then convinces Connell to hire her back, with a substantial raise.

It’s decided they will run an article asking “John Doe” to come to the newspaper office, and that they have employment for him. The thinking here is people would show up claiming to be “John” and they could pick someone to play the part. It works, as a long line of sad looking tramps parade through the office claiming to be “John.” Of course, none of these characters will do, but as luck will have it, an injured baseball player “Long John” Willoughby [Gary Cooper] walks through the door. Unlike the rest, the humble Willoughby doesn’t claim to be “John Doe.” He tells Mitchell and Connell that he just figured if there was one job, maybe there was two. The newspaper just found itself a sucker to play “John Doe.”

As it turns out, Willoughby is a good speaker, and inspires people all over the nation, when he goes on a nation radio show with his message, a message written by Mitchell. In an organic movement that mirrors the formation of the Tea Party, “John Doe Clubs” start popping up across the country, built on the ideals that Willoughby, speaking the words written by Mitchell, sets forth.

Seeing what he has, D. B. Norton starts outlaying his own cash to fund a national tour with Willoughby and Mitchell, and to help start up these “John Doe Clubs” everywhere. Norton also puts a plan in motion for a national “John Doe” convention.

There are several plot twists, and Willoughby starts having feelings for Mitchell, but we’ll skip past that. Besides, if you haven’t seen the movie, you simply must, not only because you’ll better get where I’m going with all of this, but because this is simply a damned good movie and I want you to experience it yourself!

Moving along, we learn that the kindly D.B. Norton really isn’t kindly at all. The oil man has bought up newspapers and radio stations across the country and plans to use them, as well as the now powerful “John Doe” movement, to launch his political career. It seems Norton has his sights on the White House.

The plan is for Willoughby, as “John Doe” to deliver the keynote speech at the convention, and endorse Norton for president. At least that’s Norton’s plan. Meanwhile Mitchell has actually bought into the “John Doe” movement and has written a wonderful and inspiring speech for the convention.

It all comes to a head when the newspaper’s editor, Henry Connell, gets wind of what Norton is up to and grows a conscience, though not before getting all liquored up. He informs Mitchell of Norton’s plan, and catches Willoughby before the speech. Willoughby then approaches Norton and tells him he refuses to go along. Norton informs Willoughby that if he doesn’t go through with it, he will expose him as a fraud to the world, and destroy him.

At the convention Norton has his union thugs placed throughout the audience, and newspapers pre-printed exposing Willoughby, just in case. He also has Ann Mitchell on lockdown, so she can’t blow the whistle.

It’s cold and rainy as Willoughby takes to the stage. His conscience simply won’t allow him to do Norton’s bidding. As promised, Norton’s union thugs start calling him a fraud, when he starts with the speech Mitchell wrote, rather than the one Norton wanted him to give, and newspapers magically appeared exposing Willoughby, conveniently leaving out Norton and his newspaper’s part in it all. Pretty soon the entire crowd turns on Willoughby.

Destroyed, Willoughby takes the role of “John Doe” all of the way to the top of the town’s municipal building on New Year’s Eve, where he intends to jump.

Much like the fictional “John Doe” movement, the Tea Party is an organic movement that got it’s inspiration from a man who was fed up. On February 19, 2009 CNBC anchor Rick Santelli, reporting from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, went into a well deserved rant about the corrupt dealings going on in the financial markets and called for a new Boston Tea Party. This rant, heard around the world, spoke to tens of millions of fed up Americans who would form thousands of Tea Party groups nationwide.

Though mostly without a formal structure, and no national leadership unifying all of it’s members, the Tea Party has become a powerful force in American politics. It didn’t take long for politicians to try and co-opt the movement for their own gains. For the most part though, Tea Party members turned out to be more sophisticated than the politicians hoped, and with only a few notable exceptions, weren’t fooled by the phonies in the least.

That didn’t stop the GOP from riding the Tea Party’s coattails into 2010 and historic victories nationwide. With the help of Conservative leaders like Sarah Palin, we saw the greatest nationwide political turnover of power since Reconstruction after the Civil War.

Of course, not everyone the Tea Party helped put in power stayed true to their mandate, and those who have are despised by the Republican Elite. You see, true Conservatives cannot be corrupted by Washington, nor can they be controlled by the party bosses. The more the GOP has tried to get Tea Party members to “play ball” the more resistance they have met. The Republican Party bosses want to keeps the status quo. They want to keep their little power bases and corrupt deals alive and producing. They want nothing to do with real reform and real reformers.

True reformers, like Sarah Palin, are attacked unmercifully by the Republican Party Elite. The last thing they want are strong, powerful men and women who, if elected, would dismantle the entire corrupt establishment machine. [in both parties] Something that must be done if America is to survive.

Since they can’t control the Tea Party, the Republicans are again imitating the movie, and have moved into the seek and destroy phase. Recently we’ve seen Speaker of the House John Boehner purge Tea Party Republicans from leadership positions in Congress, and his minions bad mouth the Tea Party to any and all who would listen. As you can imagine, the democrats, and their corrupt media partners, are loving it all, and reporting it breathlessly.

History is being rewritten, and losses by establishment hacks are now being blamed on the Tea Party. The GOP is blaming the Tea Party for all of the loses in 2012, never mind it was their standard bearer, Mitt Romney, who lost to the worst president in American history, and it was their candidates who failed to win 10 seats. Seats that would have put the Senate in Republican hands.

Now we have Karl Rove, one of the most despicable human beings in politics today, renaming his failed political action group the “Conservative Victory Fund” in an attempt to not only co-opt the Conservative movement, but stop the Tea Party as well.

As we reported last November, Rove’s group spent between $100 million and $400 million [depending on who you ask] on various establishment candidates. Rove had a 1% success rate. In comparison, Sarah Palin had a 75% endorsement success rate and America Grizzlies United [Organize for Palin] a group of Palin supporters nationwide, had a 66% success rate, putting candidates in office locally, statewide, and of course, in national office. Thomas S Schmitz, Chairman of the Board of American Grizzlies United, tells me the group spent less that $1000 total, the rest was just good old fashioned hard work.

No wonder Rove wants to destroy the Tea Party and other Conservative groups. They are making him look like the worthless hack he is!

Though establishment candidates lost big in 2010, and Tea Party candidates won huge gains all over the country, the Rove wing of the GOP love to bring up two candidates who lost: Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle.

The elites use these two ladies as examples of why the Tea Party is a failure and can’t be taken seriously. For the establishment, this is a twofer, because they can bash Sarah Palin at the same time. The GOP lies when they bash Sarah, and they lie about Angle and O’Donnell.

First let’s look at Sharron Angle. For one thing, Sarah Palin didn’t endorse her in the primary. She didn’t endorse any candidate in that race, as both her dad and brother had endorsed Danny Tarkanian. BTW, Mitt Romney DID endorse Angle in the primary, something the GOP Elite never mention. Now Sarah did endorse Angle once she was the nominee, but so what. Who else was she gonna to endorse? Angle lost because many liberal Republicans in Nevada backed Harry Reid. Plain and simple.

Christine O’Donnell is another matter altogether, and if anyone is to blame for her loss it’s Karl Rove. Yeah, she was, and is, quirky. But O’Donnell was sincere and had a real Conservative message, and no doubt would have made a good Senator.

As it was, you had George Soros’ boy, Republican Congressman Mike Castle, who only voted like a Conservative at election time, and voted like a socialist democrat the rest of the time, or Mike Coons, the self-proclaimed “bearded Marxist” on the democrat side. Quirks and all, Christine O’Donnell would have made a far superior Senator then either one of those two idiots!

Karl Rove didn’t quite see it that way. You see, Rove had dealings with Congressman Castle, and had hoped to further them along with a Senator Castle. As Michelle Malkin reported at the time, Rove had met with Tea Party leaders in Delaware and tried to convince them to leave his boy Castle alone, and NOT support O’Donnell’s bid for the Senate. As it happened, the Tea Party told Rove to shove it, and O’Donnell got massive Tea Party support from around the country. She won the nomination handily.

O’Donnell was still giving her victory speech when Karl Rove took to the airwaves on Fox’s Sean Hannity Show and proceeded to rip her to shreds. In Fact, Fox [and Hannity] allowed Rove to bash O’Donnell for three nights in a row. As you can imagine, the left ate this up, and their media partners reported it all breathlessly.

Had Rove kept his yap shut, we’d probably be addressing her as Senator O’Donnell to this day. We’ll never know. What we do know, is before Rove’s despicable attacks, O’Donnell was favored to win over Coons by a respectable amount.

Now Rove, along with the rest of the Republican Party machine has targeted Conservatives for defeat. It’s Rove and the GOP’s intention to destroy the Tea Party, and stop Conservatives from winning primaries. Never mind that Conservatives have traditionally won, where the unprincipled squishes the establishment is in love with, do not, and cannot.

This is where you, the American People, come in. It’s time to hold ALL politicians accountable. All politicians from BOTH parties.

As Conservatives, we have very few places to go. The democrat party has been taken over by Marxists. The party of the KKK, Jim Crow, and Margret Sanger is beyond redemption. Thing is, the party of Lincoln and Reagan ain’t much better.

Since the days of Barry Goldwater, Conservatives have tried to reform the Republican Party, and force it to live up to the principles it pretends to stand for. The only brief moment of victory was the Reagan presidency, but Republican Elites have been trying to erase Reagan’s triumphs since the day he left office.

So what are we to do? There are dozens of registered political parties, but none have proven viable. I think at this point, a real reformer COULD win the presidency as an independent, but then what? A president without a party would have both the GOP and the democrats doing everything possible to stifle any attempts at real reform, both parties hoping to get back in power quickly. It would be a frustrating situation.

How about creating a new and vibrant alternative? I’m of the mindset that the Republican Party has become just as morally bankrupt and beyond redemption as the democrat party, but for different reasons. I personally think it’s time for the GOP to go the way of the Whigs, the party it replaced.

It takes time and money to create a new party, and one would have to convince many solid Conservatives already in office to leave the GOP and join that new party. Can it be done? I don’t know. It would take a dynamic leader, and a solid message of real reform. Sudden, and relentless reform. The American people thirst for that message and no-bullshit leaders who would deliver on it. But is it really possible to start a new party?

One thing I do know is the Republican Party machine, with the help of the corrupt media, and much to the delight of the democrats, aims to destroy the Tea Party and the entire Conservative movement, once and for all.

The question is, are you just going to stand by and let them get away with it?

The final scenes of Meet John Doe have D.B. Norton and all of his cronies atop the city municipal building waiting to see if Willoughby will show up and jump. In fact, Willoughby does show up, ready to make good on his threat, after mailing off a letter exposing everyone and everything.

Norton greets Willoughby and tells him that if he jumps, his people are already down there, ready to grab his body, and bury it in an unmarked grave, and no one will ever know. It’s at this point that Ann Mitchell, who has broken free of her captors, shows up and begs Willoughby not to jump, and in tears professes her undying love for him.

Willoughby is dead set on jumping, when members of the “John Doe Club,” folks we’d met earlier in the movie, make their way to the top of the building where Willoughby, Mitchell, and Norton are. They are accompanied by Henry Connell, the newspaper editor.

These “John Does” all plead with Willoughby not to jump. They tell him they don’t care how it all came to be, that they believe in his message, because they have used it in their own lives, and seen positive change in their own communities. It’s then that Ann Mitchell, crying, collapses in Willoughby’s arms and he picks her up and starts carrying her toward the crowd of “John Does

In the very last scene Henry Connell looks at D.B. Norton
and says with a dare: “The people, you just TRY and lick ’em!

3 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics, Ronald Reagan, sarah palin

Chuck Heath Jr. [Sarah Palin’s Brother]: Time for a New “American Party”

chuck-heath_sr-sarah-palin-chuck-heath-jr

By Gary P Jackson

Sarah Palin’s brother, Chuck Jr. has posted on Facebook what many of us are thinking. While he doesn’t suggest Sarah as the party leader, or future presidential candidate, he certainly lays out the case for her, as he describes the reasons liberals in both parties hate her!

This is an issue that I’ve been mulling over for quite a while. I wrote more about the way I’d set this up, but I wanted to get some of your feedback first. Let me know what you think.

Enough is Enough: Has the Third Party’s Time Come?

We’ve lost our way. The American political system is a mess. The divisiveness between Republicans and Democrats seems insurmountable and it’s getting worse every day. I could get into the reasons that this is happening, but I doubt that would change a thing.

It is very painful for me to see this country literally becoming unraveled at the seams… especially when I look at my own children’s future. I’ve watched friends and even family members break ties over political differences. I have watched good, smart people enter politics and seen them change for the worse over the years as they’ve become part of the political machine.

Political seniority often leads to leadership positions but has nothing to do with performance. Casting a favorable vote for something you may not even believe in, just to gain a committee chair or for some other future favor, is rampant in politics.

It’s a very dirty game and it’s the reason so many really talented people never get involved in it. It’s also the reason my sister Sarah Palin, has been so viciously attacked over the years. She refused to “play the game”. She has always stuck to her principles and because of that, she is viewed as a threat. I’ve watched people in both major parties do everything they can to demean and destroy her. And all for what… for trying to limit the size of government? For asking all of us to do our share? For insisting we spend less than we take in? For ending crony capitalism? For going above and beyond to support our military? For utilizing our natural resources in a responsible way? For praying? The list goes on.

Let’s face it. As it stands now, it’s impossible to be elected to a high national office without being a part of the Republican or Democratic Party. I propose that the disgruntled citizens of the United States… Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians… persons of every race, religion, economic status, and whoever else is interested, join together and form a new party. I’d simply call it, the American Party.

The American Party sure has a nice ring to it. It’s exactly what we need!

2 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics, sarah palin

The Blunt Truth About The Democrats’ War on Women

By C.A Bamford

Little has changed in the Democrat Party since the days of Jim Crow. Except now the target of their attacks are women. The party that started the Klu Klux Klan, the party that fought tooth and nail to stop the Civil Rights legislation and opposed Republican, Martin Luther King, the party that called Juan Williams a “porch n****” for daring to voice his opinion, is now hatefully going after women.

Not that certain party leaders, and Obama confidants, haven’t been attacking women for decades.

But not just any women. They’re fine with toadying females who obediently mouth the party line ….

…. and serve as barking dogs for their empty rhetoric.

They’ll back fictional biographies from confused old liberals ….

…. tout faceless cradle-to-grave welfare composites….

…. and ignore embarrassing incidents from party icons again and again.

But let them happen upon a conservative woman, and out come the knives. These left-wing dingbats reserve their most hateful behavior for conservative black and Hispanic women who defy their rule of race.

Not surprisingly, gay conservative women are their worst nightmare, and a gay conservative woman who supports the 2nd amendment will lead them to wail “WHY?” and curl into a fetal position before your very eyes.

The party of incivility has become blind and deaf to the filthy verbal assaults on good women, innocent children, and even the most vulnerable in our society. No attack is too crass, no trick too dirty.

Ironically, while the liberal elite snigger and offer weak excuses for the deplorable use of the “C” word by some of their basest members, they ignore their pink-draped cohorts who are shouting “Look at us, look at us!” as they desperately seek to claim that label, even going so far as to dress the part.

You have gone too far, liberal shills. You criticize Ann Romney, a woman who raised 5 sons, battled cancer and MS, served as First Lady of Massachusetts, and volunteered countless hours to charity as one who “never worked a day in her life.

You continue to demean the accomplishments of Governor Palin, who had more executive experience and more accomplishments than all three men on both tickets in 2008. Do you doubt that she would have had the dictators of hostile nations running for cover? Or that your crony capitalist pals would be out of a job?

America is appalled at the ignorance of those of you who criticized Olympic Gold Medal winner, Gabrielle Douglas for her hair and the indulgence of a small treat.

She’s the size of one of your thighs for Pete’s sake, and burns more calories in an hour than all the calories many of you carry on your hips.

So listen up Jay Carney, media hacks, political pimps, and all the rest of the inbred society of Beltway elites. We are sick and tired of your biased comments, patronizing dismissal and smirking insults against smart, successful conservative women.

Keep tossing your small barbs and straining your small wits. Feel free to cling to your inconsequential accomplishments as though they somehow make you special. One can train an elephant to paint, a monkey to dance, and a chicken to play the piano, all accomplishments that outdo any of yours. You’re not so special after all.

Perhaps it’s the rarefied atmosphere of the ivory towers and halls of power in which you gather to scheme and plot that makes so many of you so cranky. No doubt you would benefit from getting outside in the fresh air a little more often. Try picking up garbage on the roadside…and if you do it in an orange jumpsuit, all the better.

Meanwhile Barack Obama is leading the REAL war on women with his failed economic policies. There are seventeen million women in poverty, with 7.5 million living in extreme poverty the highest numbers since the 1960s.

Keep up your smears, lies, and bad behavior Democrats. But remember, we’ll be out here waiting for you in November.

4 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics, sarah palin

“Racist” Democrats Requiring Attendees to MA Convention to Show I.D.

By Gary P Jackson

It’s funny, every time those concerned with massive voter fraud attempt to put legislation in place requiring voters to show legitimate identification, before being allowed to vote, democrats throw a hissy fit. We hear non-stop talk about how unfair it is to ask someone to show their I.D. just before they vote. Never mind you can’t write a check, rent a car, or even purchase some prescription drugs, without showing your I.D.

We’re told it’s unfair to the poor, that it disenfranchises voters, and of course, the race card is played long and hard.

Well, I guess one can say that the Massachusetts democrat party is officially racist, and is actively disenfranchising some of it’s members. As Mike Flynn at Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government reports, no one will be allowed to attend the Massachusetts democrat party convention without a photo I.D.:

In recent years, Democrats have argued that requiring voters to show photo IDs prior to voting is an egregious act of voter suppression. Ben Jealous, of the NAACP, has gone so far as to argue that such requirements are tantamount to modern-day Jim Crow laws.

In the world they inhabit, lots of voters don’t have access to photo IDs, so requiring voters to provide this will “disenfranchise” them and leave them out of the democratic process. Funny they don’t feel that way for their own party conventions. 

On Saturday, Massachusetts delegates will meet in their state’s Democrat party convention. The votes of these delegates will determine whether there are primary elections for their party nominations. With so much at stake, Democrats have decided to implement Voter ID requirements

Read more here.

Why are Massachusetts democrats so racist? It seems they really still are the party of Jim Crow, Margaret Sanger, and the KKK.

Or …. it just reinforces the fact that democrats squeal like stuck pigs when voter I.D. laws are put in place, because it makes it harder to commit voter fraud, one of the few things democrats are truly good at.

Why are we not surprised that democrats have one standard for the general public, but when it comes to protecting their own interests, have an entirely different policy. If it weren’t for their double standards, democrats wouldn’t have any standards at all.

Leave a comment

Filed under In The News, Politics

Congressional Democrats Living In Fear Of Sarah Palin

Looking at the prospect of losing both the House and the Senate this year and the White House in 2012, democrats are desperate. The American people have soundly rejected the entire Marxist agenda that Obama and his radical Congress has tried to foist upon them.

Knowing they have almost zero chance of remaining a viable political party after this Obama, Pelosi, and Reid fiasco, congressional democrats are bringing out their bete noire to try and motivate their rapidly shrinking base of supporters.

From the DCCC website:

Recently Sarah Palin declared that she will be getting involved in Republican primaries like she did in her losing effort in last fall’s special election in Upstate New York. At the tea party convention, Palin stated, “Contested primaries aren’t civil war; they’re democracy at work and that’s beautiful.” [Sarah Palin, 2/6/10].

To make her job easy, the DCCC is launching “Palin’s Primaries” a new site that will track the most divisive and messy House Republican primaries in the country.

Palin will have plenty to choose from: There are at least 55 competitive Republican primaries, many with Tea Party candidates, in Frontline races, open seats, targeted Republican districts, and other races House Republicans are trying to hype. The DCCC will regularly feature the messiest House Republican primary races out there.

Man, they got a nifty little map and all! Hilarious.

Obviously the democrats desperately hope the Tea Party movement will somehow field their own candidates, thus splitting the Conservative vote. I guess they haven’t been listening when Sarah has said third party is not the way to go, and that Tea Partiers need to “pick a party” and work from within to change. In most, if not all cases, that messages resonates with Tea Party members. They understand just how important the up coming elections are. They also understand that it’s easier to take a party over than to start a new one.

It worked for the Marxists in the democrat party!

I am forever tickled by democrats. They run around telling people that strong leaders like Sarah Palin are “inconsequential” or my favorite “dumb.” They claim to be our intellectual superiors, knowing “what’s best for us.” The funniest thing about our “intellectual betters” is how truly ignorant they are.

As always, democrats tell you who they live in abject fear of. There are no “stop Olympia Snowe before we all die” campaigns out there!

Say what they will, this private citizen, this mother of five from Wasilla, Alaska, has these people scared for their political lives. Frankly, they should be. Time and time again Sarah has proven she has the power to take these people on, and defeat them from her Facebook page! One can only imagine the destroyed democrat political careers that will dot the landscape once Sarah actually hit’s the campaign trail!

Next time you hear a democrat tell you just how “inconsequential” Sarah Palin is, remember what they are really saying is Sarah Palin is a strong and proven leader who scares the bejeezus out of them.

11 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics

A Nation In Peril: A Continuing Report On The Attempted Coup d’état By The Democrat Party

Earlier I wrote a lengthy dissertation on what amounts to a coup d’état by the democrat/communist party, so I won’t rehash all of that now, although if you need background, you can go here.

The American Thinker, one of our favorite websites, has several pieces that fit right into what is going on. As you know, the democrat/communists are going to attempt a “universal voter registration” scheme that will make it even easier for them to steal elections. It also goes completely against not only the Constitution, but the very concept and framework our founding fathers created for the nation.

Let’s start with Ed Lasky’s analysis:

Obama and the White House Chicago Boys

Barack Obama has a problem. His polls numbers are dropping and his policies are fueling an angry backlash across America. The Democratic party is held in disrepute, and congressional Democrats are dropping like flies. This imperils Obama’s radical agenda and his own 2012 prospects. What to do? Game the system and rig the future elections. That is how things are done in the streets of Chicago.

Signs are emerging that the Chicago Boys — the triumvirate of Obama, Emanuel, and Axlerod — are up to their old tricks, as I touched upon in a previous American Thinker column. My recent interest was piqued by two news items that floated across my screen in the last week.

One was the release of the White House visitor logs that showed visits by Anna Burger, Secretary-Treasurer of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and named by Fortune Magazine as “the most powerful woman in the labor movement. ” We know Andy Stern, head of the SEIU, routinely visits the White House and has boasted of the tens of millions of dollars and man-hours the union spent in electing Barack Obama to the presidency. We can expect a repeat performance come 2012.

But Anna Burger is far more than an SEIU honcho; she also is the vice-chairman of a shadowy group called the ” Democracy Alliance,” composed of billionaire funders and savvy political operatives who set out a few years ago to change politics as we know it in America. Among their projects was something called the Secretary of States Project that set about electing secretaries of state in key battleground states. ***Editor’s note-Lasky is talking about George Soros as the funder! -Gary P.

These are the very officials who are charged with maintaining the integrity of the voting process. Recall the controversies in Ohio and Minnesota — including ACORN problems — regarding the accuracy of the votes in those states last year? The secretaries of state who gave a stamp of approval to these elections (where Democrats won) were Democrats supported by the Democracy Alliance. Various state chapters of the Democracy Alliance have formed to use a range of controversial methods to ensure Democratic victories. (See “The Colorado Model” by Fred Barnes for a display of the type of tactics that can be used to manipulate elections. These include creating faux controversies, spreading them through supposedly non-partisan groups created by Democrat activists, and relying on an echo chamber effect until the mainstream media picks up the “story” and broadcasts it far and wide. Other groups are formed to harass journalists and editorial writers who don’t push the liberal line.)

Was Burger in the White House to plot future strategies with, say, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod? These are putatively the Chief of Staff and Senior Adviser, respectively, to President Obama. But before that, Emanuel was the maestro of political fundraising and spending, and Axelrod was a veteran political strategist who has run numerous political campaigns over the years (including Obama’s). The Democracy Alliance has helped form front groups to get Democrats elected. Axelrod is a master at this type of tactic.

The Alliance’s handiwork played a role in the victory of Al Franken over Norm Coleman, which helped secure a sixty-seat majority in the Senate. There was a group — Alliance for a Better Minnesota — that posed as a group of concerned citizens. The Alliance was funded by outsiders, namely the wealthy, hyper-partisan Democrats behind the Democracy Alliance. This was a so-called astrotruf group: it falsely appeared to be a true grassroots effort.

Tellingly, the Obama team has killed off disclosure rules mandating that unions reveal how they spend the billions of their members’ union dues. These, in turn, are often poured into “front groups” and other “funds” each year. Anyone care to wager whether these funds will flow to help Democrats? Thanks to Obama, we will never know. So much for transparency. But we do have change.

The second item that sparked my interest was Obama’s move to ditch the superdelegates’ role in nominating Democratic candidates for the presidency.

These superdelegates include Democratic members of Congress, national party figures, and established leaders of the Democratic Party. They vote at the nominating convention. The system was established in the wake of the 1972 Democratic Party nominating process, when anti-war radicals seized control of the party and ended up nominating George McGovern. The superdelegates were supposed to ensure that radicals did not take over the party’s nominating process. Well, apparently that sort of restraint does not appeal to Obama, who now has taken steps to shape the nominating process to play to his preferred territory: the caucuses, where his brand of populism holds sway. The Wall Street Journal noted the trick:

One reason for the superdelegates in the first place is the disproportionate role of activists in states like Iowa, which rely on caucuses rather than primaries. Mrs. Clinton held in her own in the primary states but Mr. Obama crushed her in the caucus states where his supporters found it easy to dominate proceedings where older and frequently busier people weren’t able to invest the time to counter them. Take the case of Texas, which has both a caucus and a primary: Mrs. Clinton won the state’s primary in which 2.8 million people voted, but Mr. Obama so controlled the caucuses where far fewer people (some 800,000) participated that he ended up with more delegates overall. The new rules, if approved, would likely mean even more of the same.

Since Obama’s policies are sacrificing the careers of Democratic congressmen to fulfill his agenda, these politicians may withhold their support at a future nominating convention. What is the solution? Remove them from the equation by stripping their vote. Out they go, joining the ever-increasing number of bodies under the bus.

Of course, the boys who earned their stripes in the rough-and-tumble world of Chicago politics (where the phrase “vote early and vote often” should be the city’s motto) will not stop there in their drive to win.

Why should they? Customs, rules, ethics, and traditions were thrown under the bus to get ObamaCare bills passed by the House and the Senate. Why stop there when there are so many ways to skin Americans? Skullduggery comes naturally.

There are other cards to play (and Obama is an avid poker player).

How else will the Chicago Boys game the system and gin up victories?

There was the plan to bring the census operations into the White House. That would have been a neat trick — put Obama acolytes in charge of the process that determines each state’s electoral votes (a strategy akin to Obama’s role in gerrymandering districts to favor his own campaign as a state senator).

While that seems to be off the plate for now, there is still the prospect that sampling may be used to collect census figures. That is a statistical method that has been denounced by, among others, John Fund of the Wall Street Journal as a formula that could be abused to exaggerate the number of residents of certain states and municipalities. This would affect the number of House seats awarded to each state. Those figures also play a role in the amount of federal funding flowing to those areas. Those are also the very figures used to determine electoral votes.

Will census figures compiled by community groups chosen by this administration be reliable? Remember that this team earned their stripes in Chicago and has ties to ACORN, which is embroiled in voter registration and other scandals across our nation.

There will be a strong desire to boost numbers in blue states, especially since red states seem poised to pick up seats and electoral votes, as people vote with their feet and move to red states. This won’t do for the Obama team — not at all.

So what to do? Fool ’em with some other numbers, this time the ones with dollar signs in front of them. But the Chicago Boys may have tipped their hands by revealing one of their cards:

The government, reports The Hill newspaper, will target $80 million of those dollars to racial and ethnic minorities and non-English speakers — groups that vote disproportionately Democratic. Nor will Democrats permit efforts to limit the count to those here legally. An effort by Sen. David Vitter (R., La.) to exclude illegal aliens from the count went nowhere.

Illegal aliens don’t (usually) vote of course. But when they are counted in the Census they do affect representation in Congress. So some of the money you pay in taxes will go toward increasing the legislative clout of one party.

And those illegal aliens will also boost electoral votes of those blue states. We can also expect a campaign to allow felons to regain their right to vote. Anything to boost those numbers and rack up some wins.

But wait, there’s more.

The push to “Rahm” through universal voter registration is a ploy ripe for voter fraud, as noted so well by my American Thinker colleague James Simpson in his recent column. This is a proposal to impose a federal mandate regarding voter registration. State laws will be overridden by federal law drafted and passed by Democrats. As John Fund notes:

The feds will tell the states: ‘take everyone on every list of welfare that you have, take everyone on every list of unemployed you have, take everyone on every list of property owners, take everyone on every list of driver’s license holders and register them to vote regardless of whether they want to be …’

What is the problem? Many of these lists include vast numbers of illegal immigrants, there will be felons, there will be duplicates, and there will be a lot of people who never cared enough about the country or democracy to take the simple steps to register under state laws. What will be the end result? A huge pool of likely Democratic voters will be created out of thin air — and then Obama’s army of volunteers and Democratic Party activists and paid contractors (think ACORN) will shepherd them to the voting booths. Between the pickup at home and the pulling of the lever, a lot of steps can be taken to ensure they vote the left way.

Are there any more ways for Obama and the boys to stack the deck?

The Federal Election Committee monitors how campaigns raise and spend money. Obama has appointed John Sullivan, SEIU’s in-house lawyer, to serve on its six-member panel. Obama’s campaign was marked by fundraising and spending scandals. (Among them were foreign donations being received and hundreds of thousands of dollars going to the SEIU, and to Obama-linked ACORN for “get out the vote efforts.” Hmm…”get out the vote“…is that anything like “street money“?) Community groups are being used, by the way, to collect census numbers. Given the record of “community groups” and vote fraud, is that a bright idea? The answer depends on which side of the aisle you sit.

The Department of Justice under Eric Holder, a close ally of Barack Obama , has shown a very lax attitude towards prosecuting Obama supporters for voter intimidation (B la the New Black Panthers Party travesty). Conversely, the DOJ is aggressively challenging state voter verification laws meant to ensure the integrity of the voting process. The steps that Obama’s DOJ is taking will allow non-citizens to vote and will also boost the number of votes, legitimate or not, for Democrats in 2010 and Obama in 2012. Does anyone think Holder’s Justice Department will prosecute criminals that help Democrats, given the example of the New Black Panther case?

The administration has also telegraphed a plan to push for illegal immigrants to become citizens. How many of the estimated twelve-million-plus new citizens will vote for the man, and party, that bestowed upon them U.S. citizenship? Quite a few, I imagine. It’s true that there will not be a quick payoff for this effort, since citizenship will take some time. However, there will be some Democratic voters created, and the effort will curry favor with groups that favor such immigration reform.

Many blue states are indeed blue (emotionally) these days because their economies are a wreck. Think California, New York, and Michigan. All are states that may no longer be so rich when it comes to money, but they are rich with electoral votes. These states might pose a problem for Obama in 2012 (vote the bum out). How to salve their anger?

How about billions and billions in stimulus money that is disproportionately being showered upon Democratic districts, and that often does not correlate as well with unemployment numbers as it does with partisan makeup? This is stimulus money, all right — designed to turbocharge Democratic turnout and reward Democratic interest groups (teachers, government workers) for their fealty to Obama. This is a far bigger pot of money than what’s collected when we voluntarily choose to fund elections on our tax forms.

There are other steps that Obama and the Chicago Boys are taking to help Obama. Obama may have won the Nobel Peace Prize, but he knows how to fight when it comes to his own career. Let’s remember that this is the candidate who un-presidentially boasted that he brings a gun to a knife-fight — one more sign that he does not play fair! Of course, if he had only a knife, he would likely use it to stick someone in the back, as is his wont. He did this with drug companies when he suckered them into a deal to back health care reform and then reneged on his pledge to oppose drug re-importation efforts after their support was in the bag. Israel is one small voodoo doll to him, given his proclivity to stick it to that nation. All the pledges and people thrown under the bus…

Will the Chicago Boys sic the recently expanded Internal Revenue Service on Obama’s ever-expanding scroll of enemies? He joked that he would do so when Arizona State University had the temerity to question his bona fides when it came to awarding him an honorary degree. A joke, yes — and like the jibes at Special Olympics contestants and Joe Biden, not a particularly witty one.

What happens when a media outlet does not kowtow to Obama? They get the treatment meted out to FOX News. What happens when a pollster reports Obama’s plummeting popularity? The Chicago Boys rev up the vast Oval Office conspiracy, as they did when their liberal shock troops attacked Scott Rasmussen. What happens when talk radio ticks off the Obama team? Threaten to resurrect the Fairness Doctrine. Then apply a dose of Media Matters criticism. Lather it up with some insults, and then rinse and repeat.

If that doesn’t do the job, release the dogs of war (bloggers, Air America, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow) to spread some misinformation and insults (“teabagging“).

And of course, there is always, always the race card. Obama’s ace in the hole.

There are other perfectly fine steps Obama is taking to prepare for 2010 and 2012. For example, the Obama drones are being prepped to swarm our neighborhoods again. That is legitimate, at least, if annoying.

But are the tricks outlined above legitimate? Weren’t we promised the most transparent administration in history, one that would transcend partisanship? That was so 2008. Sweet talk has been replaced by trash talk, and promises have been and will be betrayed.

What we got was a team that will stoop very low indeed to win elections, honesty and transparency be damned. Obama may be a good basketball player, but he and his team excel in the blood sport of politics, and they will use every trick and tactic, no matter how disgraceful, to win. That may be the Chicago Way, but it is not the American Way.

Who knew subverting democracy was so easy?

There are many reference links in Lasky’s writings, I urge my readers to take time to explore them all by going to the story here.

In another piece, John F Gadski delves further into this plot, and seeks to explain it fully and discuss the ramifications of it all:

Understanding the Democrats’ Scheme

Poor Bill O’Reilly and Brit Hume. There they were on the O’Reilly show a few weeks ago, puzzling over why Barack Obama and the Democrats are doing so many things that are damaging to our country. Bill and Brit agreed that they couldn’t possibly be harming the nation intentionally, because negative voter reaction would redound to them politically and electorally. Can’t the Democrats see this? Did they suddenly get stupid politically? This is so unlike them. How to explain this anomaly?

Poor Bill and Brit, and many others, indeed. It is time to think the unthinkable and speak the ineffable. Apart from the troubling question of intent, or whether Obama-Pelosi-Reid just have a novel view of the public interest, the national Democrats are unnaturally and mysteriously sanguine despite growing backlash by the American people. Why? One reason: The Dems don’t believe they will ever have to face a real election again. Is their plan not becoming obvious? It is very straightforward:

(1) Grant amnesty to the illegal aliens (the correct term for lawbreaking invaders, regardless of their natural and rational motives) which will create up to 30 million reliably Democrat voters — especially after being registered at least once each by ACORN. That is cushion enough to carry any national election. Why else could Dems be so fixated on this agenda item?

(2) Speaking of which, between ACORN and the SEIU, the Democrats will be stealing all the elections they really need anyway, starting next November. (The New Jersey and Virginia governorships aren’t quite as big a prize as control of the U.S. Congress, are they? And one wonders what the real margin of Republican victory in New Jersey was, absent ACORN’s intervention.)

Many laymen still don’t understand how the ACORN scam works. To them, ACORN’s excuse that they are merely committing voter registration fraud, not vote fraud, seems plausible. Here’s the deal: Register 100,000 phony voters such as Mickey Mouse and the Seven Dwarves, thus expanding the nominal voter rolls, and the Democrat vote counters then have the latitude to create 100,000 extra votes out of thin air on election night. This is what “community organizer” really means, and Barack Obama is forever stained by his ACORN background. Not that it matters to him.

America should brace for the biggest vote fraud and election theft caper of all time on election night 2010 — and in the months following. We now know as well that the Dems are guaranteed to win any statewide recount where there is a Democrat Secretary of State. And who, we must ask, is there to enforce the election laws now?

What of Florida 2000? It is easy to correct the prevailing misconception. One can usually tell what offenses against the commonweal the liberal Democrats are committing by what accusations they make against others (into which they project their own tendencies). In November 2000, Democrats did everything they could to try to steal a national election for the second time in forty years, right before a nation’s very eyes, with local partisan functionaries inventing Gore votes out of those dimpled chads. Still, the Democrats have claimed since Y2000 that George W. Bush stole that year’s election, even though every Florida recount, including those sponsored by the media, demonstrated that Bush 43 really won under the law. Republicans have been so ineffective in publicizing these true results in answer to the Democrat mantra that the propaganda has largely taken hold in the public consciousness.

(3) As if they need it, the Dems will be secretly encouraging (maybe even hiring) third-party candidates wherever they need them, because they know that is the way to split the opposition vote. It almost always happens that way to the Democrats’ benefit. If people such as Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck don’t realize this soon, instead of talking up the third-party route, they will only help to ensure a permanent Democrat stranglehold on Congress and the presidency — although any one of this litany of methods would probably be sufficient for that. So the Dems are actually conservative in the sense of wanting some built-in redundancy!

(4) What do we suppose the extra trillion dollars of “stimulus” money to be spent from 2010 to 2012 is really for? Just a coincidence, or a ready-made election slush fund? How much has already been committed to ACORN and SEIU?

(5) Then there is the “universal voter registration” plan that the Wall Street Journal’s John Fund has spotlighted, granting automatic voting privilege to anyone who has ever registered for practically anything, anywhere, anytime. The Democrats and their henchmen could work with that, couldn’t they? Or why are they so eager to enact it? Their entire history has been to oppose laws that prevent vote fraud, after all. (What could be their motive for that particular laxity?)

These five strategies should be enough to ensure permanent Democrat control of our federal government — a virtual dictatorship. For them, it is a royal flush. But another part of the scheme may be the most pernicious of all. The worst is yet to come.

(6) When you become dependent on the decision of a Democrat bureaucrat for crucial medical treatment — after the health care takeover — how much power does that give the Democrats over you? Elderly voters tend to vote more conservative than younger voters, so letting the elderly die because care is “too expensive” can reshape the political profile of the electorate. But can we reasonably foresee that party registration or political contributions might enter the bureaucrat’s calculus? Might it occur to the intense partisans of the Obama administration to grant lifesaving treatment to those they regard as “their people,” but not to others? What a neat way to eliminate the opposition! Party registration is already public information. And if they can overturn the secret ballot for union elections via “card check,” how long before they try to impose the same more generally, so they will always know how you have voted? Do not trust the judiciary to save us, either, after President Obama packs the courts with more ultra-leftists.

Chilling, isn’t it? But not extreme: Obama himself has notoriously displayed his disregard for human life by the stated willingness to sacrifice “grandma” to a pain pill and his coarse support for unrestricted abortion — even opposition to the Infant Born Alive Act, which he has tried to obfuscate.

When the Democrats achieve literal death-grip power over the lives of all our citizens, that’s when they also achieve their long-cherished dream of absolute power in a virtual one-party state. Now is it becoming transparent (so to speak) what the real scheme behind their mania for “health-care reform” is? Now does it all make sense? This is not your father’s Democrat party.

This issue is not about health care, ultimately. It is about raw political power and the long-promised radical takeover of the United States. For anyone who hasn’t thought of all this before, I guarantee that Obama and his party’s other leaders have.

Dictatorship in a one-party state indeed seems to loom for us. As one prominent commentator has pointed out, the normal order of the human condition is tyranny, subjugation, and dictatorship, with only a couple of respite periods throughout history, including our time in the West over the past two centuries or so. It just took that long for the totalitarian types to gain near-total power in our country, which they are now consolidating over the coming year. What are the betting odds that they will ever let it go voluntarily?

No wonder the national Democrats aren’t concerned about having to face the electorate again. Pity the naive, hapless Republicans who actually imagine they have a fair chance later this year and in ’12!

The long-time president of my university, Fr. Theodore Hesburgh, used to say, “At our school, we ask all the questions, even the tough ones.” How’d I do, Father?

The most troubling aspect of my analysis is that it represents the logical extension of irrefutable, objective facts. At least five of the six premises are no more and no less than observable Democrat behavior, and the other is a mild extrapolation at most. This is not good.

It’s over, America. We are now living under a proto-dictatorship in the United States. In less than a year, the full reification of it will be apparent to all. Have a nice day. R.I.P., U.S.A.

Pretty harsh, huh?

Look, the democrat/communists are evil, pure and simple. It is their intent to take America for themselves, to enrich themselves and their cronies, and fund their tyranny on the backs of the American people.

We are at major turning point in American history. We no longer have the luxury of sitting back and letting someone else “take care of things.” It is the duty of each and every able bodied American, man, woman, and child, to stand up and protect your freedom. To organize, to strategize, to take to the streets.

It is our duty as American citizens to protect and defend this great nation from evil, from tyranny. Sadly, most of us, this writer included, have been AWOL for too long. The barbarians are not only at the gates, they are sitting in our house, the people’s house!

Barack Obama, the most evil and corrupt president this nation has ever know has teamed up with a group of violent thugs, as well as the most corrupt Congress in our nation’s 233 history. These power hungry psychopaths, these neo-Marxist devils, intend to completely and totally usurp our Constitution, by simply ignoring it. They have such a stranglehold on America that they will be almost impossible to stop without the extraordinary effort of the American people, who must rise up against them.

It is very much the intention of Barack Obama and Congress to “fundamentally change” this nation from a republican form of representative government, the most successful the world has ever known, and “transform” it into a central command and control dictatorship.

These are people who, unlike normal, everyday Americans, do not celebrate our wise and great founding fathers. These are people who despise them. Instead, these are people who worship men like Mao Tse Tung, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin, and even Fidel Castro. All of these are evil, brutal men who murdered at least hundred million of their own people for political expediency. (Except for Marx, of course, he was the “idea guy”)

These men presided over brutal dictatorships where the people had no rights, where it was only the government.

As we witnessed last year, there are many in the Obama administration who openly expressed their admiration for Mao Tse Tung. Anita Dunn called him: “one of her favorite philosophers,” and there was an ornament hanging on the White House Christmas Tree with the likeness of Mao on it. And yes, it was red!

Mao murdered between 50 and 70 million Chinese, depending on who you talk to.

And never, ever forget, these are the sort that just LOVE to wear Che Guevara t-shirts. Ernesto

Che” Guevara was a mass murdering psychopath who teamed up with Castro during the revolution in Cuba. So evil, so violent was Che, that Castro finally had to run him off. Che went on to terrorize others in South America under the name of the communist revolution.

What does this mean to you, the average American on the street? This means that people like Obama and his ilk are truly evil and take their world view from characters that have absolutely no problem killing anyone and everyone who stands in their way, who attempts to stop them from seizing complete and total control of all peoples.

I suggest that those who don’t understand the evil that is communism, the evil that is Obama and his merry band of Chicago street thugs, all Saul Alinsky devotes, each and every one, take a little trip over to the Global Museum of Communism, at their address on the web, here.

In closing, it is a time for choosing, Do you choose to allow our nation to be destroyed? Do you choose to allow yourself, your life, your children’s lives, and the lives of your friends to be destroyed? Do you choose to live a life of slavery, controlled by tyranny and evil?

Or…

Do you choose liberty and freedom! Do you choose to continue a way of life that is the envy of the world!

It’s just that simple you know. You have two routes. The easy one is to sit back, do nothing, and just accept what comes.

The other route, the route where you retain your liberty and freedom is hard, very hard. You will be required to work like you have never worked before. You will be required to go “all in” with your efforts. You will be required to sacrifice time with your favorite TV program, or recreation.

In order to defeat the evil that has gripped this nation, you must be fully informed and engaged. You must be ready to rally with other Americans and take the fight to the enemy, the enemy from within.

Which way of life do you choose?

Leave a comment

Filed under In The News, Politics