Daniel Hannan: Crony Capitalism is Failing; Let’s Try the Real Thing

By Gary P Jackson

I’m hard pressed to remember anyone talking so much about crony capitalism, or as some like FBN’s Eric Bolling call it, “crony socialism,” before Sarah Palin made the term, and the concept of fighting this cancer on society, popular.

Obviously, corruption in government isn’t confined to Washington, or even the United States. Overbearing, overreaching, nanny state governments are ripe for corruption, and cronyism. I’m not sure anyone can put an exact number on the amount of money wasted, flushed down the toilet, simply pissed away, because of cronyism and corruption. But it must be in the hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars, world wide.

Daniel Hannan, our favorite Member of the European Parliament, has penned a strong defense of capitalism, real capitalism, and the free market:

The past four years have seen governments throughout the West turn to a ghoulish corporatism, in which selected private companies are bailed out with public money. Understandably, people from across the political spectrum have reacted angrily. The Tea Partiers and the Occupiers are both protesting against the same thing, viz the rescue of large banks by taxpayers.

But whereas the Occupiers, in a slightly inchoate way, believe they are complaining about capitalism, free marketeers point out that, in a capitalist system, bad banks would have been allowed to collapse, their assets sold to more efficient competitors. Bondholders, shareholders and some depositors would have lost money, but taxpayers wouldn’t have contributed a penny.

When we make that argument in full – as I did in a direct exchange with some Occupy LSX types recently (see here) – the typical response is ‘Yeah, well that might be your theoretical capitalism, but we’re dealing with the one that actually exists’.

This is a reasonable objection. We capitalists mustn’t become like those student Trotskyists who were forever insiting that the USSR was a failure of state capitalism, and that proper socialism had never been tried.

What, then, is genuine capitalism? Where can you find it? What changes do we need to make to the present system to get there? I was planning to write a lengthy blog about it, but then I found that Jesse Norman, the ingenious MP for Hereford, had got there first. His paper, The Case for Real Capitalism, is worth reading in full. Having worked in the City before becoming a philosophy don, he understands in practice as well as in theory where the system has gone wrong. And he proposes concrete steps to put it right, to make shareholders think of themselves as owners rather than investors, to incentivise saving and boost competition.

Above all, Jesse understands that freedom is more than just an absence of rules: that it also implies responsibility and (in the absence of external restraints) self-control. It is the difference between what Milton called ‘liberty‘ and what he called ‘licence. His paper is distinctly conservative, yet it again suggests that, in practical terms, the differences between conservatives and libertarians can be deferred until the grave.

If you missed it, here’s Hannan’s righteous speech in Parliament from a few days ago.

This is a good time to remind people to pick up a copy of Peter Schweizer’s book Throw Them All Out. Peter lays it all out, exposing just how corrupt our American political system is. As we go into the 2012 election season, it’s a must read. It’s a book you’ll want to share with everyone you know!

I’ll tell you, as someone who is disappointed Sarah Palin hasn’t jumped into the presidential race to save us from the mutts that we have to choose from, I am totally jazzed, and inspired, that Sarah’s message of sudden, relentless reform is spreading. The more people talking about it, and demanding action, the better.

If we don’t all get off our butts and out in the streets working hard to make the reforms happen, we could elect 10 Sarah Palins, and it won’t matter. Reforming government is the fight of our lives, and we need all hands on deck. It’s obvious Sarah is doing her part, now we gotta do ours!

8 Comments

Filed under In The News, Politics, sarah palin

8 responses to “Daniel Hannan: Crony Capitalism is Failing; Let’s Try the Real Thing

  1. patricia cala

    Since there are no other comments, I will presume that no one really cares, and that is the crux of the problem.

    • Gary P

      Uh, since I just published, it might take a minute or so. Already have a respectable hit count. Not everyone who reads our blog comments.

      I did a story on the Hawker-Beech/Embraer contracting concerns in November. It gets a steady 4500 page views a day. I just published the follow-up.

  2. Chad

    I am trying in my state of SC~ I will refer the book “Throw Them All Out” and Sarah’s books as well~ I am also part of Dr Roth’s Revolution~ Herman Cain’s Revolution~ I am going to my first American’s for Prosperity forum Jan 27 2012 6:30 PM Holiday Inn on Woodruff rd Greenville SC regarding educational needs~ Here is the URL for tickets if anyone else wants to join~ http://schoolchoicesc.eventbrite.com/ Additionally, through American’s for Prosperity and other action forums I have over 12 letters of reciept from Senator Lidsey Graham for those actions~ Also I have not done it yet but I am going to print up as many as I can Sarah Palin’s Ethics Reform For Florida to hand out~ Which I have the URL here http://www.floridapoliticalpress.com/2012/01/01/sarah-palin%E2%80%99s-ethics-reform-for-florida/comment-page-1/

  3. C. A. Bamford

    Right, Gary. Many people read this blog, but only comment if they have time, and/or find a compelling reason to do so. It appears that patricia cala has found her compelling reason. Even though she has nothing to offer, she has a deep-seated need to be a pain in the rear.

  4. I tip my hat to Sarah Palin for coining the term, “Crony Capitalism”. Maybe she didn’t coin it but she made it popular. Crony Capitalism is really the Nazi socialist model of business where powerful individuals owns the means of production but Government funds and directs the action.
    This is what we have built since WWII, but the term Nazi was so associated with Anti-Semitism that it was never used. Now that we have a new description, maybe we can move back towards real capitalism.

    • Gary P

      That’s a VERY good pint. Never would have thought of it, but that was exactly the German socialist model, or Nazism. Great observation.

  5. Demosthenes

    Palin/Hannan 2016.

Leave a comment